Your Ad Here


Question: If females are the superior race GENETICALLY as has been cited many times on this site, swiftly followed with pictures of MASSIVE muscly women as PROOF... Would it be fair to say that this concept of a muscly woman actually subverts the idea given that many of these women inject steroids (artificial testosterone, or MALE GROWTH HORMONE) and those that do not inject it force their bodies to produce levels that far exceed the normal levels in female physiology, thus altering their chemical make up to be more like a man's. This also means all you little submissive men are actually homosexuals in denial...
Created by: eihc at 05:09:05 AM, Tuesday, June 28, 2011 PDT


Women actually have more "HGH" Human Growth hormones and it isn't male that's why it's called HUMAN growth hormones Dork!

AnonymousJun 28 2011 9:12pm

Read the science bitchez... It's all there. If women had higher levels of testosterone then men, I'm sure it wouldn't be stated to the contrary in every respected publication. I call two Fags in denial

fagsJun 29 2011 10:29pm
Listen, HGH IS NOT TESTOSTERONE. I can't believe you don't know the difference and then tell someone to read the science. Men and women have HGH, women have higher levels. Men and women have testosterone, men have higher levels. Men and woemen have estrogen, women have higher levels. Men get sick without having estrogen just like women get sick without testosterone. Testosterone was first discovered in male testicals and as named because of that. Later as science found, women have it as well. Women chemically make more than men but the female body converts it into estrogen. The difference between the two hormones is just a slight molecule. That is why when men take steriods that are based on testosterone (not all steriods are)they have to take other drugs to try to stop it from turning into estrogen. When it does, men grow breasts, many male bodybuilders grow breasts and the gym term is "bitch tits" and it is because estrogen is the master hormone from which testosterone is made in the human body. Some women actually do have higher levels of testosterone compared with some men. but of course the average is higher in men. There are now steriods that build muscle that is not based on any hormone at all but based on chemicals in the body that speed up chemical efficiency that develop the muscles without any change in hormones. Obviously there are women who are much bigger, stronger, and more muscular than some men. These women may or may not have high testosterone levels. The point is that these women can still be the bigger stronger sex without the high testosterone. Is there women bigger & stronger than men in the world? Everyone knows this is true. Is there small weak men in the world? Can these men still have higher levels of testosterone compared to a woman who are clearly bigger, stronger, more muscular. YES, almost any person knows that. When babies become boys in the womb, where does the testosterone come from to make a boy? From the mother! She can MAKE testosterone in high levels in her own body. THAT'S HOW YOU GET A BOY! It is usually women with high levels of testosterone give birth to BOYS! Science now knows that this is how boys are created in the womb. Mother's testosterone levels. So technically speaking, men who want boys should marry high testosterone girls! LOOK IT UP! Because she has higher levels she might be muscular. Does that make any man a fag? NOPE! You have some kind of mental disorder based on gender and really know nothing about what you are talking about.

AnonymousJun 30 2011 9:34am
"The link between female dominance and sex of offspring had already been documented" "women who are confident, assertive, influential and with a strong sense of self have high levels of testosterone (you normally know one when you've met one) and produce sons, whereas mothers of daughters tend to be more nurturing, empathic and tolerant and have lower testosterone" " Research has indicated that dominant men do not usually go for dominant women. ?It tends to be artistic, scholarly men who like dominant women and have sons. It's something about liking their energy?. SO GET IT STRAIGHT MENTAL MIDGET! MEN WHO MARRY DOMINANT WOMEN ARE NOT FAGS AND USUALLY HAVE SONS! What a revelation! Now that you know this, you can stop your attack on people based on your lack of understanding. So you might not sound like an IDIOT!

AnonymousJun 30 2011 9:56am
"The soreness is presumed to result from the body's reactions to exercise-induced microtears in the muscle tissue, she said. The consensus among exercise researchers is that damage most often occurs when the muscle is extended, as in the downward phase of biceps curls" "it is not known why estrogen might protect muscles. Dr. Clarkson hypothesizes that estrogen may be able to insert itself into cells, like muscle membranes, and stabilize them, which would protect them from tearing." - NY Times

AnonymousJun 30 2011 10:10am
During heavy workouts, male muscle drops off in strength more than 20% while women less than 10% all because the male muscle fibers are tearing on the microscopic level. The fibers no longer produde power because they have failed and riped in half. Blood tests show micro muscle fibers in the blood stream of men but not women. This is the distroyed muscle fibers broken lose and is why the male muscle weaken while the female does not. It can be measured on the strength level. So when a woman has equal muscle mass, she would have the muscular endurance advantage and actually be stronger over the course of a tough workout. I can honestly say because of the facts that women are superior in this measure of physical strength.

AnonymousJun 30 2011 10:21am

AnonymousJun 30 2011 10:22am
That was directed towards the ignorant person calling everyone a fag out of ignorance of the truth.

AnonymousJun 30 2011 10:26am
It's inersting how nature has a way of bringing the better father for the boys. The man attracted to the strong woman and not the weak woman will have the boys! Natures wisdom! Girls are raised by mothers and boys fathers. So nature pics a certain man to raise boys. The man who is attracted to the woman who is more than likely to give him a son. Even the Bible shows us that. Moses was raised by Pharaoh's daughter - Exodus 2. and recently her mummy was identified among female mummies as "the strong one" because of both her legendary strength and her strong bones. Discovery Channel's "Secrets of Egypt's Lost Queen" Hatshepsut became Pharaoh in a man's world because she was so strong, no man challanged her. This is the WOMAN chosen by GOD to raise MOSES! We all know how Moses turned out. God's wisdom. The Book of Exodus, you can read about how Pharaoh's daughter finds Moses in the basket. Scholars now know it was Hatshepsut "the strong one" who went on to rule Egypt for over 20 years.

AnonymousJun 30 2011 10:52am
All over Egypt the next male ruler tried to erase "Hatshepsut" with chisels but couldn't get them all. She is dipicted with a powerful body. Now that archaeologists have found her, we get at least a glimpse into a story that becomes more and more interesting as you learn about her leadership. Under her rule Egypt had it's greatest economy and peace. Fact is, she could never declare her self "Pharaoh" without backing it up. She was in fact so strong that no man could 'bitch slap' her and get away with it. The mummy called "the strong one" was suspect because the strong bone structure fit the legend and as it turned out it is Hatshepsut. Pharaoh was a man's job and it was way out of line and even BLASPHEMY! Truth was no man could challenge her rule. Yes it was Hatshepsut who found Moses in the basket on the river. God chose the strongest to raise Moses for the hard job of guiding the jews out of slavery. There is nothing wrong with the admiration of strong women and now that women are free to explore their strength, women like Hatshepsut are making a comeback so I suggest you just get out of her way. Or maybe fall in love with her. Do not insult the men who love them.

AnonymousJun 30 2011 12:34pm
Not even a young man can take that kind of physical punishment! Swimming that far! Watch her make it! ROLL THAT UP AND SMOKE IT! "eihc" you bone headed turd. Better yet! Show us a man that can do it, at any age! They don't exist!

AnonymousJun 30 2011 3:38pm
When a woman works out or takes on a tough physical sports, her muscles develop and yes her testosterone levels climb higher. EIHC, you have some complaining to do than take it to Nature or God. Pick one or both because that is how women are made and your cry baby attitude isn't going to make things suddenly the way you want it. Not even calling men fags will weaken these women. If you think women should be built like frail sticks, why are you bothering people who are just enjoying women as Nature/God made them. Thousands & thousands of women are proving you wrong and exercising until their muscles develop. You can see it in tennis, track, weight lifting, soccer, basketball, gymnastics, and on and on! You poor troubled soul, you were born to late and belong with the Taliban or some other century. Don't blame men for women's muscles. Tons of websites for any viewer to see are full of muscular women and many a man goes there to enjoy. You are apparently a minority and a dying breed as nobody makes any money showing weakling girls to guys like you. More men want to see the strong woman than do not, some are open and some hide it because of culture and that's it. The strong woman is way more appealing than the weak ones. That's where the internet traffic is son! LOL! Put up shots of weak women and watch the small traffic, put up srong women shots and watch the ticker spin! That's the way it is.

AnonymousJun 30 2011 4:26pm
Interesting! True no man can swim 100 miles, only women. When a woman has the same muscle mass, she is just as strong as a man but a man will never have the muscular endurance of a woman, therefore the woman is really the stonger sex. When measure on equal size. If it came down to swimming the sea to survive, men would drown while many women would survive. Obviously stronger. Same size, same strength but female endurance is the advantage.

AnonymousJul 01 2011 7:52pm
every woman's endurance is extremly high,even ability to multiply strengh in woman during adrenaline rush is much higher.i read an article about 12years old girl,who was capable to defeat three adult men,who tried to rape her but she was capable to resist with such tremendous power,that even three men couldnt manage to overpower 12y old girl,and was swooped and arrested by police,as huge noise from public toilet cabins made attention from by-passers,who contacted police.on the crime scene-two cabins were completely wrecked and destroyed during this furious rape attempt as young girl struggled with attackers.

jackJul 02 2011 11:06am
Hatshepsut reigned about 1500 B.C. Ramses about 1375 B.C. If Hapshepsut had found Moses he would have been 125 years old at the time of the Exodus which is a little ridiculous, even for a Bible story. He certainly would not have been raised as Ramses's "brother". Also Hatshepsut's successor (and son-in-law) Thutmose III conquered Palestine. Why would the Jews essentially go from Egypt to Egypt. On the other hand Ramses was in the process of losing it. By the time the 40 years passed it was probably unoccupied country.

obedient husbandJul 02 2011 5:43pm
Name: Maatkare Hatshepsut Egypt Prefix: Queen Sex: F Birth: in Waset,Egypt Death: Abt 1482 BC Note: BIOGRAPHY: Scripture tells us that Moses was 80 years old at the time of the Exodus; if we use 1443 B.C.E. as the date of the Exodus, it would place Moses' birth in 1523. The throne princess (daughter of the previous pharaoh) at that time was named Hatshepsut. Hatshepsut was the chief wife of Thutmose II. They were childless. Hatshepsut, then, if we have dated events correctly, would have been the woman who adopted Moses and groomed him to be the next pharaoh. Is there anything in the Egyptian records to suggest that this is what might have happened? Thutmose II, Hatshepsut's husband, died while Moses was still young. Thutmose II had decreed that Hatshepsut should rule jointly with Thutmose III, his son by a secondary wife. Although Thutmose III was accorded the royal titles, Hatshepsut effectively exercised the real power alone. Indeed, contrary to all precedent, she declared herself pharaoh. In keeping with this declaration, she had herself depicted in monumental statues as a man?with a masculine physique and even with the traditional false beard. All the traditional titles of pharaoh were appropriated by her, with only one exception--the mighty bull. Hatshepsut was eventually overthrown by Thutmose III about 1483--when Moses would have been about 40 years old! Was that a coincidence, or were the events related? Could the fact that Hatshepsut's designated successor was found to be a murderer of an Egyptian (Exodus 2:14-15) have been the key to Thutmose III's success in winning the support of leading Egyptians in his power struggle with Hatshepsut? If this is the case, Moses would have had good reason to flee Egypt.

AnonymousJul 03 2011 12:10am
Like i give a f*ck if I sound like an idiot on its f*cking anonymous you inbred f*ck. Clearly the only one with gender issues is yourself cos you sit on here and post 10+ times in quick succession using different names in order to prove something. I got over this bullpoo when I was ten years old women and men whos better or whatever. You can sit here and talk all the poo you want and quote youtube videos and pictures of roided up disgusting looking females (who are in no way attractive to me, a DOMINANT male as you so well put it) therefore no attraction, might as well f*ck a man, thus your a fag IN MY OPINION. This IS AN OPINION WEBSITE so if my opinion is too idiotic for you, I dont really care because your very shaky scientific 'proof' (most studies have i have read about on this matter have very small sample groups, have no comments about diet or lifestyle or conditions under which they were operated making them fairly specious reasoning even in the scientific community) has such tiny margins (i beleive one nbis study quoted the difference between males and females HCG levels in the order of less then 0.05 percent again within a tiny sample group (less then 30 people)) that it becomes irrelevant. If you want to dream about women dominating you then fine but dont try to pretend that this somehow signifies females 'taking over the world' because realistically, noone is taking over the world and if you beleive otherwise maybe you should wrap your head in tinfoil next time you go outside so the voices stop! Oh and quoting ancient (fictional) jew history is no way to win anyone over on any subject.

www.exposingchristianity.comJul 03 2011 4:24pm
Oh and if you read my original posts you will notice I never once stated anything, didn't even mention human growth hormone, I only referred to testosterone. So take your low life Jew style word twisting and shove it in your faggoty submissive arse!

easter izland hedzJul 03 2011 5:56pm
Oh and if you read my original posts you will notice I never once stated anything, didn't even mention human growth hormone, I only referred to testosterone. So take your low life Jew style word twisting and shove it in your faggoty submissive arse!

easter izland hedzJul 03 2011 6:00pm
Also in the spirit of ripping to shreds your specious reasoning, how can you present as absolute 'proof' or 'facts' something published in a. A journalistic article b. Described as hypothesis and using precuesors like 'may' curb and possibly.... Also your ridiculous comment that boys are raised by men has never been an accepted paradigm, in fact the opposite is the accepted norm that women complement males and men complement females. That is psychology 101. I knew this when I was f*cking twelve. Obviously you were raised by your father hence your inability to accept reality and troll this website trying to justify to yourself your neurotic fantasy.

eat me fagboyJul 03 2011 6:02pm
U r an ass! Woman don't need roids like men do, and they can still be stronger!

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! WAAAAAAAAAAAA! Someone PLEASE put the tit in his mouth and let him SUCK mother's milk to calm his troubled mind.

LOLJul 03 2011 11:50pm
It's sort of funny! The internet is FLOODING with images of girls and women more muscular than most men. Matter of fact plenty of information on the stregth as well. But here he is crying like a little puke! I know it's hard for you to understand and attacking out of fear is as old as Methuselah, so pull up your diaper and get used to the girl next door having muscles. She's here to stay and you're not! If women were not supposed to have muscles, they would be bones over skin. Guess what BONEHEAD? They're made of muscle! Guess what else genius? They are EXERCISING! That's right, I know it sounds like blasphemy! I know! BUT when those girls exercise, guess what happens! MUSCLES! BLASPHEMY! Girl should not have muscles! That must be why yer not god... lttle g cuz your brain is tiny WHEN it comes to thinking about those muscles, you have a stroke! Now that girls DO have muscles and it's no longer in doubt... cept for you, is this your answer? to complain? Like I said, there is a FLOOD of muscular girls for you to look at! You will die miserable drowning in female muscle. Stop it and take a swimming lesson! Put your trembling hand on that muscular girl and feel her! She's wonderful and you are missing out on the best.

AnonymousJul 04 2011 12:11am
No no no, you have it all wrong, it's really quite simple. MAN=MUSCLE not WOMAN=MUSCLE so all you have to do is remove the WO and it's back to the gold old days before Tarzan allowed Jane to swing from the trees when ever she wants. Now that Jane swings from the trees, Jane is getting stronger and Jane likes it! Now Jane swings a lot and has built her body as strong and even stronger than Tarzan! Should Jane stop swinging because it now frighten Tarzan? Tarzan lust for Jane muscles, Tarzan want TARZAN? Tarzan thinks, Tarzan reasons, Tarzan come to Jans and tell Jane "jane is Jane" and not TARZAN! Now Tarzan relax and put hand on Jane big strong calf and feel power! Now Tarzan knows Jane safe, Tarzan love Jane and know Jane work hard and swing very well. Tarzan respect Jane more. Tarzan learn leston about Jane. Tarzan free Jane, Jane love Tarzan.

TarzanJul 04 2011 12:49am
Again with the 5 posts under different names. Noone is crying like a baby. It's kinda funny that failing twisting my words you are now resorting to attempting to insult me... The only thing flooding my internet connection is gorgeous, curvy girls who are sensual and beautiful. And since you seem to have this fixation that strength and muscle is the only thing that matters, let me tell you this. What in the entire animal kingdom is the most superior? Is it 500kg gorillas? Or has the weaker species of mankind used its intelligence to overcome.... Idiot. Secondly, and this goes out to all if you, Fags and female supremacists alike, you come to my front door and show me how 'supreme' you are, and when your gasping for breath after I hit you quite gently in Zhang Men (liver 13), no amount of your delusional fantasy about women taking over the world will count for an ounce of poo. I never was and still don't pretend to be an advocate for the superiority of men or women, I believe both sexes have a multitude to bring to the table. Obviously you were emasculated by your mother, as can be blatantly seen by the comment stick a tit in his mouth. Was that your mothers solution to you when you were a child? Is she the one who provided you all the milk you could ever need right up until the age of 18? Is she in the other room now, partly grown into her armchair with testosterone whiskers on her chin, her Jew voice occasionally shattering the smoky air that you could cut with a knife while you finger your flaccid and dying c*ck as your spine cracks and falls apart, pain and aches rushing through it from years of neglect and misuse. Meanwhile this likelike fantastic is all that keeps you alive. The only baby in this picture is you and its a sad fact of life that many men choose or fall into this way of living because the opposite of true masculine character is too hard for them to get up and take by the throat. Fuk you, fuk your kind and all the measly pathetic whims that go with it.

your patheticJul 04 2011 5:49am
@ Tarzan I think Jane has been sleeping with all the jungle men while you were away on business I think a pregnancy test is in order

guy who fucked your wifeJul 04 2011 11:45am
I've been a competitive swimmer as a girl and later a strength athlete and bodybuilder. My husband is a heavy equipment mechanic in the Arizona heat. His line of work requires both brains & brawn and personally I know most men can not do what he does day in and day out. He fell in lve with me because of my strongth and my muscles that he finds sexy, I'm sure my husband would break your jaw if you called him a fag for loving me. You have no idea of what you are talking about. I find the Tarzan post funny because it is so accurate! My hsband is a very tough man and it takes a tough man to love a woman like me. My husband doesn't like fags either but doesn't have any hang ups like you do! He does like to look at other women bodybuilders but knows it's only to look at. My man is not gay! He is the scrappy kind of guy that would tear your head off for saying he was especially for loving me, his very own musclegirl. You seem confused as to the meaning or intent of gay people and not really understand that they prefer the same sex as they are as lovers and partners in life. Just because a woman has muscles doesn't change her gender. I personally think that women all girly and weak is a cultural invention and only that. You believe what you believe because it is what you were taught and that includes culture. When women "get physical" in sports they get stronger and their muscles do develop. I chose to continue to develop my strmgth and my physique and it is stronger than most men. I could have submitted to your cultural invention of me being weaker but I reject it. So does my husband. You are the one who is pethetic and believe me there are plenty of tough men out there that would jump on your S--T and Fuk you up. Many male bodybuilders who are big strong men have girlfriends & wives who are bodybuilding and they ain't gay! I have a girlfriend FBB who married a small man whom she met when he contracted photography, they fell in love. Great Couple! You have no idea what you are saying and have a LOSE SCREW! You sound pretty stupid. Really think about it. You are fighting an up hill battle that will bury you for sure. The old days are gone when women's strength was a big mystery! We know how strong we are now and men aren't turning into fags because of it. So what makes you the most red faced angry? The girl's muscles or the men who love them? Or fags? You have three people to direct your anger at. None are the same person so get more specific. 1. Gay men 2. FBBs 3. Men who love FBBs Maybe if you narrowed done your anger to one specific type of human you could spend more time doing something like loving. Once you have gotten that far, you can then focus on that anger and become a better person for it. Your judging of people through a computer wire is insanity and reflects what a pin head you are. Amazing.

CherylJul 04 2011 3:27pm
you have all my support Cheryl!-thats a hell lot of truth in what you just wrote down!

jackJul 04 2011 4:14pm
I don't get it either? How is a man a homo if he likes fit women? It's stupid! I would think a gay man wouldn't like fit women? Or women in general much less one who's well built. Strange. What ever!

AnonymousJul 04 2011 8:04pm
Smoke some weed, it's clear to me you don't need a brain.

AnonymousJul 04 2011 9:24pm
Again 5 more posts under seperate names, back to the word twisting. If YOU had any intelligence you, rather then sit around and insult me for my opinion would see this thread for what it is. It is an attack on the stupid dweeby little troll FAG who writes this bullpoo. Personally, I don't find muscly girls attractive. I find them repulsive beyond belief. If I wanted muscle I would f*ck men. Women are not taking over the world. Most importantly (and this is the kicker) every post on this thread bar mine and maybe one or two others gave been written by this spineless little bitch troll trying to justify his fetish for his mother. Otherwise, there would be more then three votes. So before you again come on here and fling a few pin head baby blah blah blah insults my way, consider this. For every stupid f*cking gay troll like you, there is a million normal, sensible level headed individuals who from time to time find idiots like you (using the same insult across the board on your posts is not particularly intelligent btw) and feel the need to give you some poo. GET OVER IT HOMO! if you really were ok with yourself then you would have no desire to do what your doing, unless like me you are extremely bored. Oh and as for my 'hang UPS', I have no problem with peoples sexuality, even Fags so long as they keep it to themselves. So this magical heavy diesel fitting husband of yours who apparently assaults people just for calling him a name is the one who actually has hang UPS. And the only pinheads on this website IS THE TWAT WHO DOESN'T READ PEOPLES POSTS THEN REPLIES USING THINGS OUT OF CONTEXT, CHANGING WORDS TO SUIT YOUR ARGUMENT AND RESORTING TO INSULTS WHEN I DONT AGREE WITH YOUR 10+ DIFFERENT PERSONALITIES (all of whom seem to share the same personality and all post simultaneously every time...)

fit women and muscular roided up sluts are two very different thJul 05 2011 5:28am
A Manchild throwing a petulant frenzy tantrum typical in toddlers is about as nauseating as it gets! I'd go so far as calling it mental illness without any stretch of the imagination! You are LOONY. But good for a laugh!

AnonymousJul 05 2011 2:54pm
Allodoxaphobia- Fear of opinions! Anthropophobia- Fear of people or society! Arrhenphobia- Fear of men! Asthenophobia- Fear of weakness! Ataxiophobia- Fear of ataxia. (muscular incoordination) Caligynephobia- Fear of beautiful women! Cenophobia or Centophobia- Fear of new things or ideas! Gynephobia or Gynophobia- Fear of women! Ideophobia- Fear of ideas! Judeophobia- Fear of Jews! Metathesiophobia- Fear of changes! Paraphobia- Fear of sexual perversion! Philosophobia- Fear of philosophy! Traumatophobia- Fear of injury! The psychiatrist would have it's hands full! LOL!

AnonymousJul 05 2011 3:15pm
The MORON wonders why nobody VOTES? Read... Choices: i dont understand cos roids have ruined my life no no im a wombman and this is insulting! no, im saying no becos i have latent homosexual feelings towards muscly roided up women what tge hell... yes you should have a phd in human psycology you sexy easter island head you YES THAT IS HOW STUPID THIS PERSON REALLY IS!

AnonymousJul 05 2011 3:18pm
A "muscly wombman" WTF is that exactly? You MORON! You are to stupid to even post here on a stupid site!

Dr. BrainyouJul 05 2011 3:24pm
Bloggerphobia - the fear that every post is the same blogger out to get you!

AnonymousJul 05 2011 3:52pm
The choices are terrible. Maybe it's a little weak man who gets angry when he found out thousands of girls are more muscular than he is, so he flipped out! He hates that they are stronger and it shows. Thanks to the wonders of the internet, he's getting the education he hadn't bargained on! Welcome to the real world pinhead. Cry it all out and then face it like a man and not a child!

CarlaJul 05 2011 4:01pm
It is a stupid mental concoction from a twisted mind! A very angry manchild who is having a pissyfit over what he calls (SP) muscly wombman" now where I come from, if I every saw a "muscly wombman" I'd grab my 12 gauge! Is it harry? Does it have BIG FEET? I seen one up on the mountain one time howling!

AnonymousJul 05 2011 5:43pm
Again with the 5 simultaneous posts. This time I lurked waiting for them and sure enough, one after the other they start rolling in. You sir are a sorry sack features. I on the other hand have seen enough evidence from YOU! As you state who would respond to such a ridiculous poll with such ridiculous posts, let alone comment on it. Except the strange troll boy with the affinity for thunder thighs. Perhaps you should recalibrate your judgement of intelligence for in this case whether appearance dictates or not (apparently the only part of this 'discussion' you have) maintained, however poorly) you have encountered a mind far more supreme then your own. Now go on, have the last say, or 5 or 12 or 100, but as we all know, now there will only be 2 in order to fit the profile of your fantastical world that you are building here on likelike.

the interwebz is serious business, and your gay!Jul 05 2011 6:04pm
I personally find the gay thing repulsive, gross, and personally my view is it is sinful. I've felt the same way about gays as you do but with age I've just let my point of view be just that. I don't get mad about it. I can not understand a man not enjoying the sight of a strong female? It just does not make any sense to me. I'm not gay and never will be. The only explanation for men that can't appreciate the developed female body is fear. In your bizarre world, you can't understand that these muscular girls that you really fear OWN THEIR OWN BODIES you fukin' fruit cake! They make up their own minds as to how much exercising they will do and how much muscle they want on THEIR OWN BODIES. You are to stupid to understand that concept. You can not tell these girls what they can or can not do. Why? Because they are stronger than you and you hate that FACT. I do not fear strong women as a matter of fact I love and respect them. I'm not sure who you are talking to but you are a sniveling little idiot. If a man is gay he's gay and that is that but you FEAR strong women PERIOD. I love women and often dispise MEN because they can be AS STUPID AS YOU! BRAIN DEAD! Is there ANY special "programs" you recomend to stop girls from becoming stronger and saving mankind from your imaginary problem? YOUR girl&muscle + *gay* conection is IN YOUR FUKED UP PINHEAD. You are a mental midget that simply can't think beyond that dumb conection. Like I said.. I don't even like the gay thing but you are twisted! Can you come up with some way of HIDING the girls muscles? Perhaps a BURKA? Internet censorship? A LAW! You could outlaw gyms for women! That way they would never become "muscly wombman" isn't that what you said? You moron! Can you really stop these girls or any man that looks? Look in the mirror at an >idiot< and say "NO" My guess is you are just to stupid to realize that is the truth!

AnonymousJul 05 2011 11:56pm
Timeless, obviously as you get older you become more and more narrow minded, if someone's opinion doesn't match yours they must have a small brain. News flash arsewipe, this poll only exists to unfuriate you, and it would appear the desired result has been achieved. The only idiot is the one who runs around likelike proposing laws. Suk a dik...

Beer contains female hormones. Last month, Sydney University and CSIRO scientists released the results of a recent analysis that revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. Men should take a concerned look at their beer consumption. The theory is that beer contains female hormones (hops contain Phytoestrogens) and that by drinking enough beer, men turn into women. To test the theory, 100 men drank 8 pints of beer each within a 1 hour period. It was then observed that 100% of the test subjects: 1) Argued over nothing. 2) Refused to apologize when obviously wrong. 3) Gained weight. 4) Talked excessively without making sense. 5) Became overly emotional. 6) Couldn't drive. 7) Failed to think rationally. Had to sit down while urinating. No further testing was considered necessary.

hahaha...Jul 07 2011 6:11am
Here's exactly what is says. "As a result, gross measures of body strength suggest an average 40-50% difference in upper body strength between the sexes as a result of this difference, and a 20-30% difference in lower body strength.[5] This is supported by another study that found females are about 52-66 percent as strong as males in the upper body (34-48% difference), and about 70-80 percent as strong in the lower body (20-30% difference).[6] One study of muscle strength in the elbows and knees?in 45 and older males and females?found the strength of females to range from 42 to 63% of male strength.[7]" Ok GOT IT, fact is it's based on size difference. So let's see what happens when the female exercises and compares again to the (average) again. READ. Another example of women?s strength response to a basic strength-training program involved six previously untrained females (Westcott 1985). The subjects in this study were assessed for muscle strength (10-repetition maximum weight load) in five Nautilus exercises (leg extension, leg curl, super pullover, biceps curl, triceps extension) at the beginning, midpoint, and end of the two-month training period. The women increased their overall muscle strength by 76 percent during the first month, and by another 13 percent during the second month. This resulted in a 100 percent improvement in overall muscle strength after the eight-week exercise session (from 140 pounds total workout weight to 280 pounds total workout weight). This is an incredible rate of strength gain, and clearly indicates that females can greatly improve their muscle performance. Although about 80 percent of the strength development may be associated with motor learning factors (better use of existing muscle tissue), the other 20 percent is related to physiological factors (addition of new muscle tissue).

AnonymousJul 07 2011 11:30am
That was TWO MONTHS training. That is BEFORE muscle development even gets going! A 100% increase in strength in two months. Lets just say those girls were special! Let's say four months? Still grew stronger than "average" male strength by wht 25-50%. You think her strength gain is going to suddenly stop at two months? That's just the start! That's the facts! Oh well!

AnonymousJul 07 2011 11:37am
So, when she's off to the gym, it's not just the possible outcome but the probable outcome. Be it two months or four months, that's the results. Interesting that it takes such little actual time to become stronger than the average!

AnonymousJul 07 2011 11:54am
Nice reference but this caught my attention! (The women increased their overall muscle strength by 76 percent during the first month!) A woman could become stronger than her husband within a month! Scary! Funny that it could happen pretty easy! Yikes!

DJ soleJul 07 2011 12:01pm
If you actually read the wiki article it states multiple times that the percentages take into account body size ratios. And 6 women equals less then a billionth of the human population, or >0.000000000001%. Not exactly groundbreaking stuff. And if you knew anything about body building, you would know that the first 6 weeks, the body makes neural changes only. Thus more muscle fibers are activated. This can often be perceived as a great increase in strength when realistically, it is merely the strength being used that has changed. After that, it becomes a game of building muscle. Grab a 15yo male who has never lifted weights. Train him hard for two months. At first, he could only bench 10kg. Two months later, he can bench 20kg! Wow! That's a 100% increase! Apparently reading and believing everything you read makes you (not a pinhead?). And not once did I state that there was not stronger females then males however the averages do not lie. Tiny studies that use sample populations equivalent to a single household size are inaccurate, flawed and at best merely for entertainments sake.

narrow minded and gullible = youJul 07 2011 12:11pm
Actually what it proves is that since the male strength advantage is based on size, obviously her muscles would nececssarily stronger pound for pound. These are well documented researched facts on female strength gains. It's simple math that anyone can understand. I'm sorry that the facts do not go along with what you expect to be the truth. The truth is what it is and not oppinion. Here's more... The Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, at the University of Colorado in Boulder in 2000 found that female muscle had 75% more endurance over male muscle. The study found that women outlasted men by an average of 75 percent during muscle contractions under a load. But rather than some kind of motivational effect, the study found the difference was due to some feature of the muscles. In studies carried out at the University of Jyvaskyla in Finland, for example, 10 male and nine female strength athletes (powerlifters and body-builders) performed 20 maximal squat lifts, with three minutes of recovery between each lift. After the 20 lifts, the fatigued leg muscles of both males and females had lost about 20-24% of their maximal strength. However, various indicators of muscular power favoured the females. For one thing, the force-time curve  an indicator of muscles ability to contract powerfully and quickly  changed negatively by 28% in the males over the course of the workout but dropped by only 19% in the females. Females also recovered from the 20-lift session more quickly. One hour after the workout, female lifters leg muscles could generate about 92% as much force as before the session, whereas male muscles were just 79% as strong. Why was the fatigue greater and recovery slower in males? Part of the problem seemed to be that the male lifters nervous systems became less responsive over the course of the workout. From the first to the 20 lift, activation of leg muscles by nerve cells fell by 20-25% in males but held fairly steady in females. While its not clear why male nerve activation should deteriorate more quickly, it is clear that females lose less of their muscular power during heavy-duty resistance training and seem to recover more rapidly once a tough session is over. (Neuromuscular Fatigue and Recovery in Male and Female Athletes during Heavy Resistance Exercise, International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 14(2), pp. 53-59, 1993)

DJJul 07 2011 12:46pm
^^ that has been cited before. If you read my post you would see how I point out that the percentages given on the link (wiki) are taking into account size difference so, pound for pound women have less upper body strength as percentages! As for your above study, now we have a sample group that is <.0000000003% of the human popluation. Again, worthless. The only person who wishes his opinion was truth is you or you would stop either *twisting my words or resorting to insults.

unbelievableJul 07 2011 12:51pm
Also in the example cited by 'dj', there is no mention of the health state of the competitors, prior drug use, diet, disease, previous training lifestyle etc etc.

AnonymousJul 07 2011 12:53pm
Olympic weightlifting: China Daily Updated: 2008-08-16 09:20 Novel training methods, unprecedented scientific insight, or simply hard work? " China has unlocked a new technique which allows women in particular to achieve unprecedented results. Andrew Charniga, an international weightlifting federation official, has watched the Chinese women train and suspects the secret could be in a long warm-up. While a long warm-up can exhaust men, it possibly has the opposite effect on women, allowing them to take on higher and higher loads. "It's a training method that is unique. They think women can do more loading than a man," he said."

AnonymousJul 07 2011 1:07pm
IT IS AVERAGES. Average... look the word up. Sheesh! Now I guess we are comparing healthy women champion athletes with diseased drug using loser men? Please, NOW you are grasping for straws! AVERAGE! AVERAGE! The average strength of men Vs the average gain in women. When both sexes are the same size they have generally the same strength. If a man works out and a woman just sits on her behind, she's most likely never going to be stronger than him unless she's bigger, that's different. On AVERAGE she isn't.

AnonymousJul 07 2011 1:16pm
Even the communist Chinese now know that women are unique and have certain strengths men do not have. Their success is based on knowing what those strengths really are! The Chinese put those female strengths to work and it paid off. Now more and more people KNOW what those strengths are!

AnonymousJul 07 2011 1:20pm
What The Chinese found is that the girls could pump and pump and pump their muscles up and increase the strength outup up to nearly 40% but men could not. The same technique only exhausted male lifters, they weakened. So everyone discovered something about girls and put it to use. They tried it on men and it's jst not for men, doesn't work. Male and female are not exactly the same. So there's no reason to doubt she might actually be able to pump up her strength beyond a man if they are the same size or similar strength to began with. Like wrestling, it could exhaust a man while it powers up a woman. " While a long warm-up can exhaust men, it possibly has the opposite effect on women, allowing them to take on higher and higher loads" a man pretty much has to be bigger to be stronger.

AnonymousJul 07 2011 1:36pm
I don't know if either sex is superior, maybe it goes back and forth depending on what you are measuring. Women are not really the weaker sex, they are the smaller sex. Pound for pound of muscle they more often then not prove to be stronger and that's what the research actually tells us. As long as the biggest men remain the bigger sex, most likely they will score higher in simple strength tests but never endurance. That's why a woman holds the greatest distance swimming record, 104 miles. Something a man may never be able to do but women can even up their strength with men quite a bit.

AnonymousJul 07 2011 1:43pm
Facts are a great thing! They separate (reality) from myths, beliefs, prejudice, superstitions, and fears. Facts like, Neuromuscular Fatigue and Recovery in Male and Female Athletes during Heavy Resistance Exercise, International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 14(2), pp. 53-59, 1993) Facts Like, (Westcott study 1985) Fatcs like, Andrew Charniga, an international weightlifting federation official. Facts like, The Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, at the University of Colorado in Boulder. Facts like, Woman "Diana Nyad" holds the greatest distance swimming record, 104 miles! Holy mackerel! FACTS just keep on coming!

Read all about it in the FACTS!Jul 08 2011 12:10am
Even the COMMUNIST Chinese got the facts! Wasn't for facts like this they might not have won the women's weight lifting Olympics! "While a long warm-up can exhaust men, it possibly has the opposite effect on women, allowing them to take on higher and higher loads. "It's a training method that is unique. They think women can do more loading than a man" also Those crazy Fins! " One hour after the workout, female lifters leg muscles could generate about 92% as much force as before the session, whereas male muscles were just 79% as strong" let me guess? they're just being silly in Finland? Nope! They found the facts out for us!

Fact You!Jul 08 2011 12:20am
Pretty funny! Meanwhile back in the real world where sexual preferences and gayness have nothing to do with human strength and performance! When the girls get "stronger" suddenly men go gay theory is... sorry, not based on facts. Just an oppinion from a loony internet schmuck with a mental disorder. That might not be the FACT but it's real close! Now, does any of these facts make women superior? Probably not! Does women getting stronger make men turn gay? I don't think so. Men were gay long before women embarked in athletics and bodybuilding. FACT is gay men are not interested in women. Basically any kind.

AnonymousJul 08 2011 12:35am
Why did you post 6 times what could have been spread over one or two posts... You keep citing the same three studies over and over. The math doesn't add up. So a long warm up gets a woman going. A short warm up gets a man going, meaning he is at peak quicker. It's sexual dimorphism. So what, that proves nothing. My original point was that many of these strong women inject roids, roids being commonly artificial testosterone, thus making them dominant like men. Men who like to be dominated all the time are either Fags or mummas boys, not men. Citing that women don't inject testosterone is pointless, because resistance training stimulates its production. Human growth hormone doesn't come into the equation until 6-8 hours later, usually when the person is asleep. Averages are meaningless in tiny sample groups, especially when there is an uneven number. Take a group of 1000 men and 1000 women then get me some averages, then maybe these 'studies' would have some merit. Your facts are mostly non sequitirs ( that's Latin, look it up ) and hold no merit. My judgement that men who like women on roids are Fags is also a non sequitir but instead of realising that you go on and on citing one time cases as universal truths making insubstantiated comments like even the Chinese know the woman is stronger. Then, you go on to post 5 Times to give yourself some form of creedence that is unfortunately missing from your brief, lacking evidenced argument. Beforw you now rant about ancient cultures bla bla bla, consider your statement that we are talking about averages. Is the woman who swam 104 miles part of average population? Have any men since her attempt tried to best that attempt? Am I really an internet loony schmuck with a mental disorder? Your not a doctor so I doubt your prognosis is correct. I'm not the one parading a ridiculous conspiract theory that 'women are taking over the world' or that a woman will break my puny neck... That would be you.

sighJul 08 2011 8:19am
Wrong READ it, the warm up EXHAUSTS a man is what they find. The math does add up if you can do math. Like you said "averages are meaningless" so you have no idea what man or woman uses what as far as drugs! I gave you plenty of examples that you just choose to reject as I can only conclude YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT THE FACTS! Don't bother me with facts as I have dreamed up a dumb idea and I'm going with it! Men that are gay do not want WOMEN that includes tall, short, fat, skinny, strong, and weak! Now many men who are *manly* men want strong women and will not be insulted by your dreaming up nonsene! Now this is not to say that there are not SISSY men! One look at the subject matter on likelike and you get the picture! Still normal men prefer strong women and the websites around the world having very heavy traffic and support are proof! Don't tell me that all these men are gay! That would be the actual MATH ERROR and not the facts I gave you! Personally I don't think women bodybuilders attract gay men. Most likely gay men hate them for steeling the "man's game" so to speak. Gay men often hate women and a woman that threatens MANHOOD the most! For what ever reason some men are submissive to women has nothing to do with being gay. Sissy maybe but when one considers the size and strength of thousands of women now, submission can be expected! Now if a man likes a woman race car driver is he gay? No. It is the act of being with the same sex that is gay. If a women have bigger stronger bodies then men and men still love them or even because they are so strong, the same sex love affair is not part of it. They are not homos. You may find female strength shocking but it is what it is and the FACTS prove we were wrong about women and they are not the frial creatures we thought! Frailty was a cultural invention period. Just add exercise to the girl's life and you GET THE TRUTH! They can be very strong and sexy at the same time! You may not like it or the facts but it is the truth.

AnonymousJul 08 2011 11:52am
I never said women are taking over the world nor are they superior. They do have some strengths that can be measured that men do not have. They can also become stronger than the average man very easy and even more muscular with exercise. One look around the internet and the proof is there. The average man isn't very strong compared to these girls who are often twice the strength because of strength training the girls do enjoy. It's just the facts. A man can still enjoy and even love these women and still be men! Maybe it takes a real man to face them? How you react to these women as a man is up to you. Hating them or the men who love them will not chandge anything. The ball keeps rolling and girls are getting stronger with or without your support.

AnonymousJul 08 2011 11:59am
You can't read. You said I made this statement "even the Chinese know the woman is stronger" what I really said is "Even the COMMUNIST Chinese got the facts" & "Even the communist Chinese now know that women are unique and have certain strengths men do not have" Those facts are again for the third time here. Andrew Charniga, an international weightlifting federation official, has watched the Chinese women train and suspects the secret could be in a long warm-up. While a long warm-up can exhaust men, it possibly has the opposite effect on women, allowing them to take on higher and higher loads. "It's a training method that is unique. They think women can do more loading than a man, he said." There is a difference in men and women. Men can't do that! They weaken! GET IT! Girls have some strengths men lack!

AnonymousJul 08 2011 12:06pm
Look you had tried to change the facts and make it into male superiority by saying "So a long warm up gets a woman going. A short warm up gets a man going, meaning he is at peak quicker" and that is not the truth! A man should do some lite stretching and lite warm up before an Olympic lift is attempted. He is not going to "get stronger" by doing more warm up, he will LOSE STRENGTH. So it is not a good technique for a man as he not only can increase his ower but will actually lose power! The exact opposite is true with women! She will gain power and the Chinese recorded that power increas as up to 36% higher by doing what will weaken a man! That is a huge increase in power and I could argue about superioity on that alone but I'm not. The important thing again is the AVERAGE and men are bigger when it come to that average. So men and women differ in there strengths and should actually usewhat works best in the Olimpic lift. Women's estrogen protects muscles from damage such as tearing. That is another advantage she has. Her muscle fibers are stronger because they resist tearing better. The reason the men in the leg press lost more strength than the women is "micro-tearing" of muscle fiber in men during heavy work. Not so in women because of estrogen levels are higher. So female muscle pound for pound is actually stronger. Men are usually larger and that gives them any strength advantage they have. Size matters in raw power but not in endurance. If we actually go looking for superiority it's likely to go back and forth depending on the circumstance. Women generally live longer and their heart has the same strength until age 70! A man's heart grows weaker from a young age. But statistically it's small women that live the longest. So women again have some honest strength advantages over men but it all evens out in reality. Still the truth remains that a girl can quickly become stronger than the average man by strength training.

AnonymousJul 08 2011 3:02pm
All this really proves is not that females are superior but that males are not either. You can no longer assume that a man or boy will beat a girl or women at pull-ups or push-ups and those guys in the video know this and it doesn't bother them. It is true that until recently we didn't know about certain physical strengths women have or the differences between men and women. The training girls go through now is brutal but many girls thrive on it. Are girl's like Gretchen stronger than normal? What is normal? Again all we have is averages and facts from reliable research. A girl can become twice as strong as a man. It's a good thing, "bad hombres" might not take advantage of them! Girls are better off for becoming as strong as they can, and the boys that love them are better off to have them strong! Maybe we are in fact equal.

AnonymousJul 08 2011 7:46pm
I'm right about everything I've said here and backed it with facts. To be fair let's say I'm right but so are you (the men that want big muscular girls are really gay). So if it's the muscles, there is now a full supply of women with muscles jst about as big as your imagination can pump them up to! Why are there still gay men? They were around before women ever entered a gym. You would think that under your theory, these women would be doing men a service by saving them from turning gay! No, men are gay and they love men, women can provide all the muscle they need but that isn't really it. So the men that love strong women love it 'sort of because' she is the weaker sex! It's "naughty" and we were all taught that she's weaker! When she proves to be stronger, all the rules have been broken! When some men face this fact, they generally have one of two reactions, fear or lust! Sometimes both!

AnonymousJul 08 2011 8:04pm
I have a true story for you. I have a female friend who became a bodybuilder because she took strength training after her first husband abused her. After her divorce she hang around guys in the gym and began to fall for one man who treated her nice and opened the door for her and always smilled but never could get anything going. Although she had 16" biceps and built + GORGIOUS! She couldn't get a spark out of him. She had asked me if it was that she is to big for him? I said I didn't know? He was much bigger! As it turned out the hansome hunk was as you say a "fag" and when she found out, she cried. The guy later died from using steriods! The girl has gotten even bigger but not with steriods, she's a "health nut" and has a new boyfriend that's much smaller but he's a real man! He races motorcycles up to 200 mph! So I figure he has balls of titinium! A real man! He treats his big strong woman with love and respect. I know he's no sissy and not gay! He said "a woman's like a great bike, gotta have lots of power for the best ride"! She feels lucky to be as highly regarded as a racing motorcycle! Hahaha! A nice couple.

AnonymousJul 08 2011 8:26pm
Why did you just post 0 f*cking times?? Now it is you throwing a tantrum! The fact that you have to prove to me, the 'internet loony' as you have so referred to me so many times show that you are just a latent homosexual who chases women who look like men because you can't yet justify f*cking a man so you go for the closest socially accepted thing. One thing leads to another before you will find yourself in a dark room with 10 very sensual black men. Sitting here posting 10 times like an obsessive TWAT only demonstrates that you oh so need me to cave to your weird little fantasy. Oh and look at the content matter on likelike, what all the troll polls written by you? Where is this 'proof' in national media or mainstream websites or university studies or anywhere that isn't publishing skewed stats and averages like using 9 women and ten men then saying its f*cking representative of the entire population of earth. You are a flaming homo erotic nightmare!

Just because a man rides a motorcylce that does not make him manJul 08 2011 8:49pm
It's so cool how nature weeds out the weak ones! Natures wisdom! The weaker man is not attracted to the strong woman and in that "natures wisdom" >his< seed is not wasted in the stronger woman and does not dilute her stronger genes. So the strongest survive, only the stronger man is attracted to the strong woman. It is always that way in nature so the species has the best chance at life. You are a weak man and nature makes sure you do NOT have a chance with the stronger woman. She is then rewarded with the stronger man by nature! Good thing to! The everlasting idea that the species grows stronger by separating the weaker males from the strong females so they will not mate and weaken the species! Just like wild horses! Nature is very wise and you can see it at work right here! He will not pollute the genes of strong women! Right on! Thank you NATURE!

Mother NatureJul 08 2011 10:17pm
You can't fool Mother Nature!

LOLJul 08 2011 10:25pm
Yes because you know me therefore that can be proven... Another pointless non sequitir Ha ha ha at the end of the day, all this speech of evolution is worthless in the face of the knowledge that intelligence is the evolution over size and any and all large predatory creatures that have large mass cosume much resources, thus their populations are thin and few between, usually with shorter life spans. The species that survive are those who are by nature in balance, with enough size to survive its predators but enough intelligence to know when too much is too much. Elephants are large and live a long time but are slow and depend on the herd to survive. Lions are powerful animals but they spend much if their time slothing around due to lack of food sources and conserving energy. Man has the ability to adapt and change and ultimately think, teaching his 'seed' (obviously YOU have not yet sprouted any) to think and be intelligent and despise the narrow minded Jew think that is the wannabe bitch of some dominant hebitch.

again, trying to back up your posts with others. patheticJul 09 2011 7:32am
You don't make any sense. Everything you have said is NOT based on facts and only gibberish. Gibberish (sometimes spelled Jibberish) is a generic term in English for talking that sounds like speech, but carries no actual meaning. This meaning has also been extended to meaningless text or gobbledygook. The common theme in gibberish statements is a lack of literal sense, which can be described as a presence of nonsense. - Wikipedia For example... what you just wrote! Not based on any facts but just mixed up half-witted gobbledygook! . half-witted - retarded in intellectual development. Feebleminded. - The Free Dictionary Here's an example of nonsense masquerading as intelligent thought mixed up with racial/gender hatred... " to think and be intelligent and despise the narrow minded Jew think that is the wannabe bitch of some dominant hebitch" REALLY? What language is this? It doesn't actually make any sense! How about... you are to stupid to actually talk much less think. Now that is PATHETIC! All you really know is HATE! I'll give you that! Yo know how to HATE but think? Talk? NO, you are a miserable failure. Go on about your driveling because it can't actually be construed as language! It has no real meaning and never had any facts to back up all the "intelligent hatred" and it's people like you that actually have invented creatures in your substandard brain! Here it is! A creature from a sick mind! It's jewish and it's a "hebitch-muscly-wombman" and that's why all the facts are meaningless! Because we are talking about a mythical creature! All invented by a person that can't actually think and can barely talk resulting in drivel, gibberish, & gobbledygook! These words discribe accurately the crap you have posted! The only reason I've kept it up is I've never really tried to talk to someone so stupid! It's both the entertainment value and giving any other readers some facts to dump on your hateful gobbledygook! That's all you have done here is spew hate with absolute nonsense!

AnonymousJul 09 2011 12:14pm
Here's a lttle tidbit of BIOLOGY. In the human womb ALL humans start off as girls! It is mother's testosterone that changes the girl to a boy but only when it is safe for the fetus to do so. The survival rate of boys is lower than girls and males are stricken with more health problems than girls. So in nature the fetus is stronger as a girl and is more successful converted to a boy when the survival rate is improved. This is a biological fact. All humans start as girls so men are actually modified women because that is exactly what happens in the womb. There is no beliefs or myths involved here. Just medical science and *CAMERAS* to look at it happen! In natures wisdom it's a good idea to just start with the stronger girl and then once her strength (health) is gained, then make a boy! Once the boy is created out of the girl, his survival rate drops. The fetus does not always convert to male. Often it fails and the person remains female dispite natures attempt with mothers flow of testosterone into the fetus. This is usually the stronger girl physically compared to the average girl and many boys. She thrives on higher levels of testosterone than average girls and often make the better athlete. Any thing other than the biological & medical science facts is a myth! That is the truth like it or not. If you are male, this is how you were created! Out of the female body! Cameras do not lie nor does all the medical science.

AnonymousJul 09 2011 12:39pm
A person's sex is determined at fertilization, not by the presence of testosterone or any other hormones but by chromosomes. The Y chromosome is what triggers the development of a male. The Woman's egg always contains an X chromosome. The male sperm can carry an X or a Y chromosome. If the Female egg choses a Y carrying sperm from among the thousands of sperms trying to fertilize the egg, the child will be male. If an X carrying sperm is let in, then the child will be Female. It is now known that the Female egg actively selects the sperm, rather than the sperm penetrating the egg. There are chemical mechanisms on the eggs surface which actively determine which sperm will be accepted for fertilization. The egg is a very complex cell, hundreds of times bigger than the sperm. The sperm is drawn to the egg by pheromones emitted by the egg. Naturally, the Female is a much more complex organism than the male. Her body produces and nurtures new life. She has to be stronger to survive the rigors of childbirth and to protect and nourish Her offspring. Throughout nature, females are stronger than males. Statistics on animal longevity show that Females of all species live longer than males. In fact, in most animal species the Female is actually larger than the male. This is true of almost all microorganisms, most insects, reptiles, fish and birds of prey. Larger males are the norm among mammals and most bird species. Many species reproduce entirely without males, so there are more Females in the world than males. Life begins as Female. The male is a modification which serves the purpose of increasing genetic diversity. But the Female is the superior sex.

yboyJul 09 2011 1:37pm
I read some statistics on strength gains for women from several strength trainig studies and programs and the gain in strength would put the woman ahead of the average male. Examples are simple. Male 25-50 percent stronger. Female gains 75 percent more strength in a time frame that is not very long! She's statistically as strong or stronger once she starts strength training! Compared to the average man that is. Simple math.

CashJul 09 2011 11:04pm
Alongside resistance training anabolic hormones play an important role in hypertrophy, strength gains, and leanness. Two of the anabolic hormones in the body are testosterone and Growth Hormone (GH) (Kraemer, 1988). Females have less testosterone than males (normal male total testosterone values are 0.95-4.3 pg/dl, compared to the 0.7-3.6 pg/dl of females). They also have less free testosterone (males' bioavailable testosterone is 0.3-5% (average of 2%), with their free testosterone values between 270-1100 ng/dl; compared to only 6-86 ng/dl in females). Whilst testosterone levels in females may influence physiological adaptations to resistance training, studies indicate that muscle accretion and strength gains happen with or without an increase in testosterone (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2005). Subjects of Hickson, Hidaka, Foster, Falduto & Chatterton (1994) increased both muscle mass and strength over a 16-week period of resistance training, with no change in testosterone levels. With the exception of Cumming, Wall, Galbraith, & Belcastro (1987) and Nindl, et al. (2001), most studies using acute or short-term (i.e. 10-16 weeks) resistance training has shown to have no significant (if any) change in total or free testosterone at rest, or pre and post training in females (Kraemer, et al., 1998; Hickson, et al., 1994). Despite this, females are still able to gain significant muscle and strength or lose fat effectively. Although research has been inconsistent with resistance training effects on females' resting testosterone levels (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2005), chronic resistance training (i.e. >6 months) has been shown to increase resting (and post-exercise) free testosterone in females (H?kkinen, Pakarinen, Kraemer, Newton & Alen, 2000; Marx, et al., 2001), suggesting that long-term training is required to elicit a hormonal response. Studies also indicate that there is no difference in testosterone levels between heavily trained female athletes and sedentary controls (Tegelman, et al., 1990). However, increases in strength and power have been correlated with pre-training testosterone levels (Krahenbuhl, Archer & Pettit, 1978), leading Hakkinen, et al. (2000) to hypothesize that testosterone levels in females are indicative of their trainability (although not necessarily of their results). It has been suggested that other anabolic hormones, such as GH may be responsible for hypertrophy, strength gains, and leanness in females (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2005), since such results are achieved without changes in testosterone levels. Females naturally have higher GH levels than males (Engstrom, Karlsson & Wide, 1998; Wideman, Weltman, Hartman, Veldhuis & Weltman, 2002). Exercise is a physiological stimulus for GH release, with resistance training inducing significant GH secretion. The magnitude of exercise induced GH release in females is greater than that in males (Wideman, et al., 2002). Multiple set resistance exercise increases and prolongs the GH response in females compared to single sets (Mulligan, et al., 1996); and resistance training with higher volume elicits a greater GH response than low volume training (Kraemer, et al., 1993). The largest female GH responses are observed with longer resistance sessions with high total work using moderately to heavy weights (>70% 1RM) and shorter recovery periods (Kraemer, et al., 1993). Whilst acute resistance training has been shown to elevate resting levels of GH in females, chronic resistance training has not. However, chronic resistance training still elicits a similar exercise induced GH response pre and post acute resistance training (McCall, et al., 1999). Conclusion Muscle accretion, strength gains, or fat loss in a female are NOT dependent upon their testosterone levels. There are many factors involved in each goal achievement, including an increase in all anabolic hormones. Products that increase GH (or both GH and testosterone) would be a better option than utilizing just a testosterone booster, for the female looking to optimize hypertrophy, strength, or leanness. References: Cumming, D.C., Wall, S. R., Galbraith, M. A. & Belcastro, L. N. (1987). Reproductive hormone responses to resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 19 (3). (p. 234-238). Engstrom, B. E., Karlsson, F. A. & Wide, L. Marked gender differences in ambulatory morning growth hormone values in young adults. Clin Chem, 44(6). (p. 1289-1295). H?kkinen, K., Pakarinen, A., Kraemer, W. J., Newton, R. U. & Alen, M. (2000). Basal concentrations and acute responses of serum hormones and strength development during heavy resistance training in middle- aged and elderly men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 55A (2). (p. B95-B105). Hickson R. C., Hidaka, K., Foster, C, Falduto, M. T., & Chatterton, R. T. Jr. (1994). Successive time courses of strength development and steroid hormone responses to heavy-resistance training. J Appl Physiol, 76(2). (p. 663-670). Kraemer, W. J. (1988). Endocrine responses to resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 20 (5). (p. S152-S157). Kraemer, W. J., Fleck, S. J., Dziados, J. E., Harman, E. A., Marchitelli, L. J., Gordon, S. E., Mello, R., Frykman, P. N., Koziris, L. P. & Triplett, N. T. (1993). Changes in hormonal concentrations after different heavy-resistance exercise protocols in women. J Appl Physiol, 75(2). (p. 594-604). Kraemer, W. J. & Ratamess, N. A. (2005). Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Med, 35(4). (p. 339-361). Kraemer, W.J., Staron, R. S., Hagerman, F.C., Hikida, R. S., Fry, A. C., Gordon, S. E., Nindl, B.C. & H?kkinen K. (1998). The effects of short-term resistance training on endocrine function in men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol,78(1). (p. 69-76). Krahenbuhl, G. S., Archer, P. A., & Pettit, L. L. (1978). Serum testosterone and adult female trainability. J Sports Med,18. (p. 359-364). Marx, J.O,, Ratamess, N. A., Nindl, B. C. Gotshalk, L. A., Volek, J. S., Dohi, K. Bush, J. A., Gomez, A. L., Mazzetti, S. A., Fleck, S. J., Hakkinen, K., Newton, R. U. & Kraemer, W. J. (2001). Low-volume circuit versus high-volume periodized resistance training in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 33 (4). (p. 635-643). McCall, G. E., Byrnes, W. C., Fleck, S. J., Dickinson, A. & Kraemer, W. J. (1999). Acute and chronic hormonal responses to resistance training designed to promote muscle hypertrophy. Can J Appl Physiol, 24(1). (p. 96-107). Mulligan, S. E., Fleck, S. J. Gordon, S. E., Koziris, L. P., Triplett-McBride, N. T. & Kraemer, W. J. (1996). Influence of resistance exercise volume on serum growth hormone and cortisol concentrations in women. J Strength Cond Res,10(4). (p. 256-262). Nindl, B. C., Kraemer, W. J., Gotshalk, L. A., et al. (2001). Testosterone responses after resistance exercise in women: Influence of regional fat distribution. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 11(1). (p. 451-165). Tegelman, R., Johansson, C., Hemmingsson, P., EklOf, R., Carlstrom, K., & Pousette, A. (1990). Endogenous anabolic and catabolic steroid hormones in male and female athletes during off season. Int J Sports Med, 11(2). (p. 103-106). Wideman, L., Weltman, J. Y., Hartman, M. L., Veldhuis, J. D. & Weltman, J. (2002). Growth hormone release during acute and chronic aerobic and resistance exercise. Sports Med, 32(15). (p. 987-1004).

The factsJul 09 2011 11:58pm
"The magnitude of exercise induced GH release in females is greater than that in males" & "Females naturally have higher GH levels than males" GOT IT? Growth Hormone (GH) is not testosterone. Women have higher GH and build muscles with higher GH. Period.

Myth BusterJul 10 2011 12:04am
That should put to rest the false theories and ideas the creator of this poll has put here. The total ignorance of women, men, testosterone, strength training, and growth hormones (GH) and what the truth really is! The stats were always the truth as well! You can't and have not backed up your hate with facts. Because you have no idea what you are really talking about and based everything you've said on opinion, myths, and your personal brand of hate and nothing more! I have dumped a library of truth on you! Now Learn from it.

Thanks for the intertainment!Jul 10 2011 12:22am
Haha where do I start. Firstly, my comment about you being a Jew living under the domination of a hebitch is an insult, likening you to a Jew who is the bitch of a he bitch (that's one of those ogre resembling huge chicks who looks like a dude an acts like one). I apologise if your general information comprehension skills failed to make sense of that. I shall endeavour to conform to the norms of basic English language henceforth. Also, part of the reason for what seem to be scattered posts is again a reaction to the fact that you continue posting multiple times rather then once, however since your a (manipulative c*cksucking) jew its not really surprising. Also, on that matter I am free to hate whomever I please, and make no apologies for doing so, nor will I even bother to justify where and for what reasons, my affections to whom or what, lie. Oops, was there too much information in the syntax of my previous statement? Hmm suck a dick. As for your attempt at biology lessons, since when has Victoria Beckham been a 'dominant woman' stereotype? She has a tight curved body, not one built like a brickpoohouse. (Insert whistling noise) out the window with that one. And dominant, strong gened women give birth to boys do they? Well, I'm male so what do you make of my genes? Moving on, it was never contested that women do not provide the testosterone for birthing males. It certainly isn't injected weekly by the male now is it? However your theory that dominant women mostly birth males kinda says it all. She has more in her so she supports the physiology better. (Better just reread my original question here). You comment on the female egg 'choosing' sperm. Now all this has done is reinforced how swept you are with the idea of female superiority and your mental inability to comprehend reality, since SPERM SWIM AND BURROW INTO THE OVUM, THE OVUM REMAINS ATTACHED TO THE WALL AT ALL TIMES AND DOES NOT MOVE! When the first spermatazoon breaches a certain part of the OVUM, an impenetrable layer forms around it so no others can get in. As for your copy and paste of someone's article there, let me point out some oddities. Firstly, the statement, 'although the measurements of resting testosterone levels have been inconsistent' thus making the following statement merely theory and irrelevant to reality. It also mentions very little increase in short term training. Well duh, but noone gets massive in 16 weeks. It then points out that chronic training does indeed increase testosterone levels and all statements regarding GH have the precursor 'may' meaning they might but its not proven either way. So before you post again, maybe you should read the book 'the book of muscle' written by Lou king and Ian schuler and learn about testosterone and GH in-depth before you parade around as the know it all of body building, let alone in the opposite sex when its clear you have never even picked up a barbell in your life.

easter island heads corporationJul 10 2011 10:24am
The chemistry of testosterone is nearly identical to estrogen and no matter what, it still converts to estrogen as the master hormone chemistry. Testosterone is actually modified estrogen and that is why it keeps converting back to estrogen. Read: "As with all testosterone injectables, one can expect a considerable gain in muscle mass and strength during a cycle. Since testosterone has a notably high affinity for estrogen conversion, the mass gained from this drug is likely to be accompanied by a discernible level of water retention. The resulting loss of definition of course makes testosterone cypionate a very poor choice for dieting or cutting phases. The excess level of estrogen brought about by this drug can also cause one to develop gynecomastia rather quickly. Should the user notice an uncomfortable soreness, swelling or lump under the nipple, an ancillary drug like Proviron? and/or Nolvadex? should probably be added. This will minimize the effect of estrogen greatly, making the steroid much more tolerable to use. The powerful antiaromatase Arimidex? is yet a better choice, but the high price tag prevents it from being more popularly used. Those who have a known sensitivity to estrogen may find it more beneficial to use ancillary drugs like Proviron? and Nolvadex? from the onset of the cycle, in order to prevent estrogen related side effects before they become apparent" As you can see the "artificial testosterone" isn't even able to completely separate it's self from estrogen! There are now new anobolic streriods that are not even based on hormones but apon muscle chemistry without artificialy changing any hormones. These chemicals that for example alter muscle glycogen levels are becoming popular with women. The female muscles grow bigger and stronger faster without any hormone changes.

Mr. TJul 10 2011 10:29am
So you are a small weak Nazi who hates not just Jews but strong women as well! Weird. Truth is, all that hate does reduce your health, everyone knows that and it's just another medical fact. You remember facts don't you? Those are the other things you hate! Let's see 1. Jews 2. Strong women 3. Gay men 4. Fatcs Not necessarily in that order. But some advice, the HATE makes you unhealthy and that means weak. Medical facts pal. High blood pressure, ulcers, headaches, weak immune system, and so on and so forth. Maybe it's natures way of killing off the hateful! They self distruct! HATE MORE! So the world will lose another Nazi! What a loss.

You can't fool Mother Nature!Jul 10 2011 10:47am
Oh I forgot another object of your hate! The men who love strong women! Did I leave any objects of hate out? What do you hate the most? The FACTS? The JEW? The STRONG WOMEN? You have not learned a thing. Maybe it's that you can't learn. You learned how to hate but basically are not capable of anything else. You see the world through hate. You divise your theory through hate. Your logic and reasoning is built on hate thus you have none. And you know what? That's why you are not just a weakling but always wrong. Name one human advancement in science, medical, sports, politics, any thing at all that came out right by using hate? Mmm? It does make you sick both physically and mentally and that is probably something that makes you mad. So hate that fact as well! HATE = WEAK! Get sick and weaker, that's the path you are on.

He's all hate and no substanceJul 10 2011 11:07am
10-4 over & out.

AnonymousJul 10 2011 11:09am
The man "eihc" who created this poll is gay. He is a weak gay male bodybuilder. He is enraged that other men's eyes would be drawn to the female bodybuilder and very envious that men would show affection for her and not him. He is very angry that male affection and attention would be drawn away from the male body and over to the female. He is jealous of the athletic female body as it replaces the male and wins the attention of men. Without the athletic female body all attention is given to the male as he prefers. He is gay.

Psychology 101Jul 10 2011 12:01pm
@ easter island; The ovum doesn't move, and the sperm is motile, but that doesn't mean that the ovum is passive. The fact that only one sperm is allowed into the ovum shows the active mechanism of the ovum's membrane which is very active and at least 20 times larger than the sperm. The chemistry of the ovum is very complex. It is not so simple as the old fashioned model of sperm all 'competing' to burrow into the egg. If that were the case, then more than one sperm would enter. The reason for a single sperm entering the ovum is because the ovum actively selects one sperm from all of those which are trying to get in. The sperm are drawn to the ovum because it emits pheromones so the sperm can find it.

yboyJul 10 2011 12:46pm
If testosterone is 100% the male hormone, than why does it keep turning into the 100% female hormone estrogen? It's because testosterone and estrogen are not male or female and both genders have both hormones and the have cirtain functions in both male and female. If testosterone is really "male" then why does it become estrogen? The hormone belongs to both sexes and it can be either testosterone or estrogen. A manly man can not stop his testosterone from turning into estrogen no matter how manly he thinks he is! Lucky for him his beliefs do not control his hormones as without estrogen he would become ill. Oddly enough it is estrogen that strengthens a man's bones.

AnonymousJul 10 2011 1:53pm
True! New research shows that estrogen, the female sex hormone, is also important for men's health. The estrogen in men's blood appears to be even more closely related to how strong their bone structure is than their testosterone level. Boys! If you want strong bones you have to let a little "girly hormone" do it! LOL! Really it's true, low levels of estrogen in men result in weak bones. It is what makes his bones strong.

Estrogen for strong boy bones!Jul 10 2011 2:02pm
Let me get ths straight. If a man is attracted to a woman who has used anabolic steriods based on a synthetic chemical form similar to testosterone then that man is gay. If he is attracted to a muscular woman who is strong and works out but never used any drugs he is not gay. So his gay-ness is in the hands of women? If she uses the drug at some point during the relationship he is gay at that point but not before? If she doesn't tell him, he still turns gay at the moment her testosterone levels rise? Since muscle are on both male and female bodies and women can develop their muscles with or without testosterone, what about the girl's genetics and her groth hormones? When testosterone had nothing to do with her muscular body other than her own natural leves and she's just well built? Is the man still gay? I would say no. He would really have to be attracted to men not women. Plenty of men are attracted to strong women and are offended by the homo, fag, queer, gay, man but love strong women.

AnonymousJul 10 2011 2:36pm
No no no, it's not that complex! As soon as the man enjoys looking at the woman's muscles, he is gay! After enjoying the woman's muscle he quickly wants a sexual relationship with a man. He also becomes a Jew! It's that simple! It's very scientific and research proves this to be true! Also if you form the opinion that females are superior you are gay and Jewish, that to has been proven by science and the links will be posted to back it up soon! Women's muscles leads to gayness and Jewishness, a fact!

AnonymousJul 10 2011 3:07pm
Last night while making love to my wife... I felt her biceps instead of her breasts! Have I gone to far?

LOLJul 10 2011 5:36pm
LOL, it depends on why you are feeling her biceps during love making? If it is to check and see how small and weak her biceps are to positively or confidently dispel any doubts about your male dominance, then it's ok. You are not gay. But if you have allowed your wife to strength train or bodybuild with weights or machines and you are feeling her increased muscle and power and find sexual stimulation?!? You are gay. It's that simple and a scientific paper is being written by "eihc" at this time with research and facts coming! The report comes with a gayness chart similar to a muscle chart so you can see exactly what muscle or muscle group on the female body that actually causes the gayness to began! Preliminary research shows it could actually be the female pectoral muscle closest to the breast! Other studies indicate it is the female calf as the toddler walks behind mother and first sees her muscles! At any rate the direct link between female muscle and homosexual behavior is now well established in the science community now that the Easter Island Head has done his homework! So any day expect the links posted with the data on how women's muscles make men turn gay. This should put an end to women exercising all over the world now that the dire consequence of female exercises have been discovered by the creator of this poll! Soon women's health clubs and gyms will be closing there doors to stop yet Another Scourge Upon This Land! Saving mankind from homosexuality by stopping the women who drove them to it! Ban all female sports and exercise now to save mankind!

Dr. FruitcakeJul 10 2011 8:00pm
Thanks Dr. Friutcake, I was just making sure she is still weaker than me and BY GOLLY I am feeling more dominant come to think of it! I'll keep my hands on her breasts where they belong and only check the weakness once in a while. Again thanks Dr. Fruitcake for your advice on how to avoid homosexuality all together! No, my wife doesn't exerise at all and I'm keeping it that way so I'm not tempted to fall for "the trap" and lured to a gay lifestyle! She is weak so she doesn't resemble a brawny man! That's the way it should be, keep up the good work Dr. Fruitcake and you to island head! Straight sailing for me mates, never look at her muscles!

Mr. NormalJul 10 2011 8:11pm
That is the most pathetic display yet. Not only have you posted 15 times but after failing to present facts correctly you have resorted to *weak* personal attacks (as though my existence is validated by you) and blatant outright and bullpoo lies. Firstly who and what I hate is my business however the only thing I hate is you, I have never stated I hate strong women, I only find them unattractive. I have also stated that I don't care what Fags do so long as they keep it to themselves which you have not. Now its obvious that the females who roid up are preventing their bodies from turning the testosterone into estrogen or they wouldn't be so muscly. It's also a fact that testosterone turns into estrogen in OVERWEIGHT males or males with too higher percentage fatty tissue. Amazing. Not relevant. And estrogen is good for boys bones in the levels nature intended. After all, you can't argue with mother nature. Also, women should leave their physiology as nature intended. Not muscled up to hell, as opposed to normal exercise which makes women gorgeous, not giant and brawny like men, as the female superiority polls cite as my question states. You are by far the most obbsessive compulsive, blind to reality individual I have ever had dealings with. And a homo. Take your BS 'facts' and shove em up your arse. The effort you have gone to here to defend this whole subject only further evidences your latent homosexual feelings

easter island heads corporationJul 10 2011 11:01pm
That's right you tell um! Hey, where can I order my female muscle chart? The one the gives you a boner... Er Um That helps you find the muscles that cause you to go homo? I'm sure glad you and Dr. Friutcake are working together to bring us all the research and facts about how female muscles cause men to go gay! I'm glad you are working so hard exposing all the homos! Good work especially that homo who queastions your brilliant theory and insults your reasoning and advanced logic! Thank you for the science and dedication to the truth and facts as well! Isn't there some way we can control all these brawny women? Perhaps arrest them for insighting homosexual behaviour? Impersonating a homo? There must be something but what? At least you have proven the homos facts are BS... good job! I also noticed you want to put something up the homo's "arse" as you call it. That kind of sounds like homo beaviour? I'm sure you have a good reason why you want to do some shoving up a homo's "arse" Maybe some up the "arse" tharapy that you are expert in! Anyway keep up the good work and nice to see you team up with someone with credentials like Dr. Fruitcake to make sure all of your facts you brought to the discussion here are so well presented! Now that the "muscly wombman" has been identified we can take action and save men from becoming homos!

Mr. NormalJul 11 2011 2:06am
Ok all right, I've had fun teasing you and reading your angry words! You would do a lot better without the anger really. You have made your point. All the facts I gave you are the truth. Not BS also you are right about steriods and maybe no one should use them not men or women. Fact is the problem is worse with men. It is funny how all synthetic testosterone based steriods tend to turn into estrogen. Another fact is YOU do not know who does what with their own body, you have no facts on anybody. You can say she does use steriods but the truth is you do not know. So your idea is based on suspected drug use but no facts and then think any man who enjoys looking at that much muscle on a woman makes him gay. The problem with your thinking is you have made up imaginary standards for women and somehow linked muscle with gayness? It's just your idea and not reality. The attraction to strong women or muscular women is an attraction to women whether you understand that or not. There are even men who are attracted to men's bodybuilding because they enjoy bodybuilding with other men, comparing muscles oiling muscles, flexing for each other and on and on but even they ARE NOT GAY! It's like their sport and they are consumed by it and infatuated with MUSCLES but still they are not gay! So muscles do not equal homosexuals, after all there's plenty of homos who care less about muscles much less their own health! So I do strongly disagree with you because the attraction is not to men at all and is in fact to a cirtain kind of woman. It is the fact that this person of great muscles and strength is woman that is in fact the attraction. Society and culture says she can't do that and she's weak or the weaker sex. She's the underdog that's breaking the rules with her own path and a naughty path at that! So men are attracted to her like a hot rod car insted of a lame grocery getter! These men DO NOT WANT MEN. They want women but very strng women. So what is normal? I don't think either one of us really know. It may be strange to you but it's not an attraction to men, matter of fact they would like to watch these women physically defeat men at muscle strength. It is the powerful female that attracts them and not the man who they would have this muscular woman defeat, If anything is the truth they do not like men even though they are one themself. Sometimes the over macho, contant bragging, male hero crap of every day life they get sick and tired of. Why? because it's a fake facade and many of these men actually hate the way men treat women especially strong women calling them brawny, tomboys, ugly or what ever rude names they can. It pisses the men off that love strong women. Because they love these strong women they side with them against men who talk down to these women. These men are not fags. and would like to watch a strong woman physically distroy you for your trash mouth. It's the very idea that a SHE is stronger and not the HE that drives these men to these women... not the man who is weak. It is HER strength, HER muscles that is their love and passion not HIS.

AnonymousJul 11 2011 2:52am
So do you get it? It is such an admiration for woman that in his mind she is number one. She is superior to male and the "thing" that makes men superior to women in "your mind" is muscles. It is (HER) DOMINATION in that area over man that turns these men on. SO IT'S NOT ABOUT THE FEAKING MAN! It' about her being top dog! HER/FEMALE/DOMINANCE. Not male. So now you can see the light! It is the girl that they love and not the guy. Tat's why in their fantacy the girl wins! But the question remains is SHE really superior in strength physically? That's why I brought facts to this discusion. To see if this is really true?

AnonymousJul 11 2011 9:03am
Put aside the roids and fags for a little while as that is a tiny world compared to real women today. Ok? We all know that most sports performance records are held by men. So at first it doesn't look like women are superior in strength does it? NO. But here is the truth. While men have sported it up for centuries and have set their pace in performance and set their records through time, women have been prevented from doing the same. So we have very little data on women. We do not know because she was never ever invited to the challenge. Finally in the last human generation things changed and girls were reluctantly invited to perform. It wasn't until 1971 that in the U.S. the law changed and girls could have access to sports and much of the world followed. So just like every other flesh & bone creature on earth, her body was molded by the culture that forbid her to grow stronger physically. It's just like raising K9s, you can develop a big strong hunting dog or a tiny lap dog. The female was pampered and pampered into weakness. This IS NOT her natural physical state. It is her cultural state. So we are dealing with a brand new human in the world of human physical performance. She's certainly not the male and is different. So let's look at some facts to even consider her as possibly superior. First off in the short time she's been invited to partake and use her muscles, she has out-performed men in gains! On a scale of recorded and refined male performance over the centuries, the improvement is slow and steady but in the female in her short time "at the games" her performance gains are radically differant than men ever have shown! Her rate of improvement or gains is at a much much faster pace compared to all male records ever recorded and we have plenty of data on men. She has so far OUT-GAINED the male. On a line graph her line is climbing at a higher angle than men. If this trend continues, she would pass men in performance at some point in the future. Unless the trend changes. No one knew this would happen because no one had any data until very recently. Is there a reason she has gained much faster than men ever have in men's history? So far she IS superior in performance gains in a given time period compared with men. Why? Her freedom to do physical sports is so short in time it's hard to answer! All kinds of imaginary reasons why she couldn't perform were the letter of the day but was never actually based on the truth. It was a fable and a myth about women obviously because we had zero data! Now that she has her freedom, she is developing and this is the only way we will find out the truth. Over time as the performance graph is actually drawn we see the truth and so far, she is headed for superiority, at least on the graph based on real gains, so the gains are not mythical but facts. Why would this even happen if women are weaker. Why better gains from the weaker sex?

DataJul 11 2011 9:43am
To answer that question we must look at data that we do have on both sexes. Such as (Neuromuscular Fatigue and Recovery in Male and Female Athletes during Heavy Resistance Exercise, International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 14(2), pp. 53-59, 1993) Why is the data like this? (various indicators of muscular power favoured the females. For one thing, the force-time curve an indicator of muscles ability to contract powerfully and quickly changed negatively by 28% in the males over the course of the workout but dropped by only 19% in the females. Females also recovered from the 20-lift session more quickly. One hour after the workout, female lifters leg muscles could generate about 92% as much force as before the session, whereas male muscles were just 79% as strong) & (The Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, at the University of Colorado in Boulder in 2000 found that female muscle had 75% more endurance over male muscle). Why the better performance from female muscles? This goes right along with the female gains in sports. Since science has discovered that estrogen protects muscles from damage, that explains at least part of this! The female muscle on the miroscopic fiber level is mch stronger than male, not that er muscles are different, they are in fact not! It is her chemistry that strengthens the muscle fibers. So men are now competing against another human model now that has sronger mscle fibers. Is this why she is gaining faster? Will this be the reason she does ot-perform men as time moves on and that graph is finished? Will she always be smaller or is her size really because of her cultural restraints. We now have teams of big muscular girls playing basketball, one generation ago, these girls didn't exist in any numbers at all but now it's common and they are much larger and stronger than your average man. Is the genetic make up of girls changing that fast? Suddenly they are here in great numbers. Something changed. I'm only looking at facts, not how I feel or my opinoin. Just what is happening and what has happened combined with research and numbers or data. She was this fast or that stronger and now she's this fast or that strong... facts. Recorded change and recorded performance isn't myth, opinoin, or prejudice, it's just the truth. Bottom line is can women become the stronger sex in every way not just endurance such as great distance swimming? The graph says she's well on her way to doing just that. It could change, she could reach her full potential here any day now but men haven't so we would women? I'm not so sure culture would allow her to become stronger than men. Even if it is possible. Male nature is to stop her from doing it. That is exactly what history teaches us. But there is a growing male support for her of men that will not stop her but instead back her in her efforts to find her true strength. Her true strength is not revealed yet. We are just getting started. Or we go backwards and stop her. I do not think that will work out any more. She'll fight back now and continue to find her real strength. That strength really is a mystery and only enough time will give us the answer.

DataJul 11 2011 10:24am
See what I'm saying? Never mind the roids and fags that you have focused on. I do understand your point. Still the female does have muscular qualities that men do not and probibly never will have. Now for opinion. I believe the better performance gains from women is from the stronger muscle fiber that science has discovered and proven. That's why she can swim 100 miles, it doesn't hurt her muscles and does hurt the male muscles. We now know this to be the truth. It is my opinion that this fact about her hormones might give her the edge in the years ahead as the female body develops genetically. It is happening and that is why we have those huge basketball girls in one generation. They didn't come from another planet! In 1940 you could search the world for girls that size and that mch muscle and you'd really come up short. Not enough to from so many teams. That is biological gender changes. No roids just real change. Time will tell, men have had all the time in the world to prepare and we have the records now it's time for women. All we have is what's happening.

AnonymousJul 11 2011 10:44am
Women are superior There's no apparently about it

AnonymousJul 11 2011 11:07am
You obviously want to get pummelled by a woman :All in positive thinking! First in a quiet place visualize yourself smaller and weaker and know this will be you. Second visualize this big woman. Detail her description, hair color and weight. Make her very big and powerful. Finally let you run into this woman where she will savagely attack you and beat you. Visualize all of it in a quiet place and know this will happen. Send your desire out into the universe knowing that it will return to you multiplied. Not sure why you would want that? And make sure you do want that because it will come back to you multilpied, which could mean your death. We are all part of that universal power. which means we can harness that power to bring to us our desires. the problem is most of us dont know what we desire. And some of our desires are self destructive. We always get what we desire, not what we want. Think clear and hard whether you want to be physically assaulted by some big lady. know the possible outcome. But after all that, if this is your desire, then use that technique and it will happen! We always get what we desire

AnonymousJul 11 2011 11:08am
Now since the female muscle actually out-performs the male in the gym (male weakens sooner) and the female muscle resists damage better than male while pound for pound producing the same power because it is the same (male & female muscle is the same) but she has that hormone protection, it is a real advantage. A strange fact is this. Women actually get more out of testosterone then men when it comes to muscle. What I'm saying is that if you bring a female's T levels up to that of an average male, not higher but the same and you put both through the same workouts, she will usually become stronger and more muscular than the male. She has the testosterone receptors but for some reason she gets more bang for the buck out of testosterone than a male. Why? Beats me. It is a known fact though. The other fact is that women who do not ever use any steriods at all still have their testosterone levels climb much higher when they workout hard for sports. 50-100% increase is very common. When women win at athletics the testosterone climbs even more. After winning! So the natural T levels in women are just now being looked at and studied. Not long ago we didn't know any of this. So with her higher growth hormones than men, her ability to make her own testosterone increases along with using the testosterone more efficiently at building muscle (less 'T' to gain muscle) and her muscle fiber protection, doesn't it seem possible that now that she is free to explore her physical power she does have some advantages and possibly become the superior athlete? after all it wasn't long ago we thought man was the strongest swimmer out in the ocean but he really isn't and in the gym his muscles fail before her's does just like endurance swimming. If you look at the data and not the gender it's easy to see the stronger athlete and it's female. Her disadvantage is her average size. I believe that will change as it already is! Men will no longer have that advantage because the small female was never natural to began with but had always been the result of culture (stop her from doing athletics) was the societies culture. If we did the same thing with men and pampered them, they to would be weak and smaller. Crossfit competition has girls out-performing boys all the time and nobody really is surprised by it. More pullups by the girl is common not because she's the stronger sex but because she's not the weaker sex, She decided what her strength should be and proves she can be stronger simply by working at it. In that respect the past culture was very wrong about girls. Nothing to do with roids or fags just performance which is truth. Just think about it as you have no argument on this. Your argument is the steroids are wrong and should not be used. I'm simply showing you the world without steroids still backs my point. Females may not be the weaker sex at all. The facts show they are the stronger sex but still the smaller gender and that could very easy change. The big basketball girls almost came out of nowhere.

AnonymousJul 11 2011 11:48am
Blah blah blah ^^ the question is does women pushing weights subvert female superiority as they try to make themselves like men as per the original wording. Yes, yes it does,therefore your homo

drunkeness destroys clarity 6 posts...sadJul 11 2011 1:33pm
I can't underatand what you are saying? sub?vert/Verb: "Undermine the power and authority" So pushing weights undermines the power and authority of female superiority as they try to become men? So now you have another theory, women try to become men by pushing weights? So after pushing weights they sprout male sex organs? Can you please give us all references that show once women push weights they grow the male sex organ? You can't honestly be this stupid! I never lied about anything here and gave you well documented facts from real science, research, Universities, records and so on. Still you dream up the most stupid ideas and wording! Exercise does not make women into men. Women who workout are not trying to turn into men. Women can't turn into men by exercising any more than men turn into women because women exercise or by exercising themselves. That's not how the genders are created but I thought that subject was already covered BUT YOU WERE MENTALLY MASTERBATING ABOUT HOMOS REMEMBER! JUST LIKE NOW! So you still can't understand facts? You are justto stupid to think about anything othert than homos! You can't talk about any truth at all, You can't ttalk about the performance of men and women at all... only about homos. You can't discuss the virtues of the female physique and where dhe exels or falls short, her strengths and weaknesses and the same with men. You have never even tried. It's all about the homos, homo this homo that, homo is your favorite subject! This is a homo poll written by a homo because it's all the he wants to talk about. It's as if women actually do not even exist much less have any information about their strengths and weaknesses. The subject over and over and over has been taken by YOU right back to yaping nonsensically about homos! FUK YOU! Have a nice HOMO LIFE now that it is the center of your world. It is your conversation always! YOU ARE IN FACT THE HOMO! Homo on your brain at all times really says something! I tried to talk about women but not you it's right back ti the favorite subject of YOURS homosexuality! Not women. You FAG! When women sprout male organs from exercise than write a book called "women will grow a penis by exercising) but until that actually happens keep intertaining yourself with your favorite subject... homosexuality! The subject of women is not for you. Especially the part about the female physique. That you have zero knowledge at all. Obviously it's the truth with the women turning into men through workouts and all the homo talk. I've never met anyone so one track minded ever and to think the one track mind is welded to the subject of homosexuality and that is ALL there is to talk about really says it all! WOW! One things for sure for any person who reads this. Tere are good facts I put up here that proves what strengths women actually have. The other think is that the person who started this poll has a one track mind and only one subject he's interested in and that's homosexuality. What a CREEP! He'll come back and call me a homo for wanting to talk about the facts on women & physical performance differences between men and women. Apparently that as a subject either does not exist or it is taboo but not homosexuality, that is the poll creators favorite subject. Easter Egghead is a pervert, a stupid pervert at that! I've never seen anyone so infatuated! Obsessed! No other subject, narrow minded, one way thinking ever! It permeates every single sentence until you realize this IS the only thing this guy really wants to talk about. Now that it is established that this is this guys favorite sunbect I'm gone because there nothing else to talk about. It's homo talk or the highway! You may have te floor and talk about your beloved subject now that you have shown no interst in talking about females. Homo it up pal! Yer an expert!

AnonymousJul 11 2011 2:41pm
You homo you! Didn't you know men used to be women but exercised and turned into men? That's where men come from! Ask the egghead, he's found the missing link to homosexuality! It is women exercising! They turn into homosexual men after a few reps, it's already been proven! As soon as women are prevented from exercise, the whole problem of homos will go away! That's why finding the link like he did is so important! A gym full of girls is nothing more than a homo factory! It should be against the law! They go in female and come out male and than men turn homo as they see them coming out of the gym! It's all very scientific you see! If we could stop women from going to the gym we could stop homosexual behaviour! Once a man's eyes see the girl's muscles his destiny is without a doubt queer! Homosexual behaviour isn't really about being with the same sex, not at all it's really about being with the opposite who has partaken in exercising that makes men gay! It's the new gay... brand new! So spanking new it was invented right here by my research expert who strarted this poll BUT make no mistake! This new theory will take off like wildfire as soon as word gets out about women turning into men because of fitness! The new homo wants the opposite sex! Our new theory changes everything so anyone can be a queer, ANYONE! female fitness = homosexual men! It's not men+men anymore! It's much much worse than you thought! It's women+men= homo! Get it! As long as she works out and you are with her your are a homo! I know, I KNOW, all along you thought it was about same sex sexual relationships! WRONG! The new theory by the Easter Head PROVES it! It's kind of like an oxymoron but we're almost sure!

Dr. Fruitcake Phd in stupid theoriesJul 11 2011 3:15pm
So if you enjoy looking at muscle, even if it's on a *GIRL* then you are gay! See how simple it is! So when a man flexes and looks at his own muscles he's gay! It's the act of looking at muscle apparently, girl or guy! It's worse than looking at and enjoying the girl's muscle because now it's "same sex muscle" when you look at your self! See, with this retard's theory, you are always a "homo" unless of course as a boy or man you have never looked at, flexed, or enjoyed your own muscles. Now that you're a fag for looking at the girl's muscle, you're in even deeper when you look at yourself! This dippoo is a freaking moron! Blow it out ya bunghole! FREAK!

AnonymousJul 11 2011 3:42pm
The person who started this poll has a muscle hangup related to sexuality because of his own weakness compared to the thousands of females that have larger muscles and more strength and physique. Something he feels he deserves because he is man but sees the opposite sex actually possesses. He is angry that the female has the body he has always wanted but never in fact had. He feels she has stolen what is 'his' in the more powerful more muscular body that she now has. It's pure envy. ANGER!

Psychology 101Jul 11 2011 4:14pm
Female muscle domination involves male and female and can be sexual in nature and a shared fetish by both genders but is not homosexual by the definition of the word. It is between boy & girl and man & woman and can not be dicribed as anything more than opposite gender relations. It's still boy meets girl and what type of physique either one has has nothing to do with gay realations that are between same sexes as the definition actually means that. It is impossible. Words do have meaning. Without meaning, language breaks down and communication ceases. AKA NONSENSE!

Common sense 101Jul 11 2011 5:14pm
Wow, again you post 5 times. why would you waste so much energy unless you truly had latent homosexual feelings for men, but you yourself have a hang up about the social implications of this, so you go for the next best thing, a female who looks like a man cos she has so much testosterone (from the heavy squats and deadlifts, known testosterone boosting exercises when done regularly) that her muscles have become like a mans. So now it is acceptable for you to be leering at and smelling the male physique but they're a woman so oh no your not a homo. BUt deep down when you nestle up into your roided up womans armpit and you smell the sweet aroma of male body odour produced by the overload of testosterone in her system (which would only turn to estrogen in the presence of large percentages of fatty tissue, of which she has none)you are in heaven. Your latent homo feelings are satisfied but your family and friends are none the wiser. And 'jane' is happy that she has someone to bully because your submissive nature feeds her inherent need to feel powerful over another human since her daddy raped her as a child.

easter island heads corporation 101Jul 12 2011 12:49am
I believe some men are physically weaker than the average woman. But most are in the 17 to 22 age category, which means many arent even physically mature.Actually, many guys are not fully grown until they are 26. A woman is physically stronger than a boy, but never a man.Guys enjoy your youth, go rassle with the girlies, because once you become a man,you take charge!

Human Development 101Jul 12 2011 6:11am
Human development 101, you wrong, there are women stronger than men in all age catatories, I think you are right with teen age girls maturing faster but I have experienced women stronger than both me and several other men all the way from my teens until now being soon 60. The biggest difference for me has been since I became 50. My wife and several of our female friends and relatives in that age group has proven themselves strong and often stronger than me and other men

RickJul 12 2011 7:42am
^ compare those to Mr Olympia winners over the years. Women lose hands down every time. @ Rick, its not surprising you are being beaten at your age. The male body starts breaking down testosterone into dihydrotestosterone thus you experience lack of muscle strength endurance etc amongst a host of other nasty non strength related symptoms. This is in effect a type of male menopause. On the other hand, female menopause results in higher levels of testosterone (that's why ladies grow whiskers as they age). Studies in men between the ages of 60-90 have shown that regular weight resistance training can boosts levels if testosterone up to 40% which will stop these women beating you and return you to your former glory, as well as offsetting death and increasing your vitality and resistance to disease. Of course you would need balls to get up and actually do it and clearly you have none.

only 5 posts this time ?Jul 12 2011 12:13pm
A woman is physically stronger than a boy, but never a man? Pretty stupid statement. Easter head is a retard. Everyone is a homo that doesn't agree with the "fantasy" of a world of weak women without muscles. Never mind the real world. The dumbsht has a hangup.

A poll for morons in fantasy world of weak womenAug 01 2011 3:02pm
Been reading these polls for awhile about strong muscular bigger women etc. Think most are very bogus myself. Am a professional white male, 50 years old 5'10" 190, athletic not a bodybuilder tho. Am here by challenging any big strong muscular woman, bodybuilder, powerlifter, whatever, bigger the better, stronger the better. Challenge is to any female who will come meet me here in oklahoma, and literally use her full size, strength, muscle and power to lift me, crush me with full strength, lift, carry, throw me around the room like a rag doll, bodyslam etc, without regard to injury to me. Seriously using ALL her full size, power and muscle on me for 2 hours. No mercy asked, will sign injury waiver as well or release of liabilities to you etc. Any women takers, all you have to do is contact me at and put likelike challenge in your subject line. Cash prize if you come to do this and claim it is 2500 dollars. Will make a nice Christmas if any really tough or muscular women exist in real life besides these stupid polls. I am extemely serious. Lets see if any really huge big strong or muscular powerful women exist, or if they just talk talk talk.

sjsh99Dec 01 2011 8:29am

1Dec 25 2011 3:53am

1Dec 25 2011 3:53am

-1'Dec 25 2011 3:53am
steroids are for pussies whose inferior genes dont let them be strong naturally

AnonymousMar 21 2012 8:18am
Yes indeed, that's sometimes the case Anonymous. If, for example, your cat is suffering from an auto-immune condition, which can be genetic, the vet might well prescribe a course of steroids.

SteveSep 16 2013 12:59am
Been reading these polls for awhile about strong muscular bigger and Amazon women etc. Think most are very bogus myself and are women who jus love to run their mouth. Am a professional white male, 50 years old 5'10" 190, athletic not a bodybuilder tho. Am here by challenging any big strong muscular woman, bodybuilder, powerlifter, whatever, bigger the better, stronger the better. Challenge is to any female who will come meet me here in oklahoma, and literally use her full size, strength, muscle and power to lift me, crush me with full strength, lift, carry, throw me around the room like a rag doll, bodyslam etc, without regard to injury to me. Seriously using ALL her full size, power and muscle on me for 2 hours. No mercy asked, No limits, no restrictions on you to unleash ALL your power size and strength. will sign injury waiver as well or release of liabilities to you etc. Any women takers, all you have to do is contact me at and put CHALLENGE in your subject line. Cash prize if you come to do this and claim it is 7500 dollars. Will make a nice cash prize if any really tough, big, strong or muscular women exist in real life besides these stupid polls. I am extemely serious. Lets see if any really huge big strong or muscular powerful women exist, or if they just talk talk talk and are really sissies in real life. And NO I will not fight back or anything else if any woman interested.Pass this on if you know any big tall or bad ass women

sjsh99Apr 06 2017 12:42pm
medical education

AnonymousMar 16 2020 6:40pm
WozgE4 levitra nizagara

rqmKTpnUdEdROct 18 7:05am
o4YaJj levitra nizagara

lGDgJRFIfomUJuNgaTzOct 18 7:48am
3OltW8 levitra nizagara

rQbnbgWYpMvvOct 18 10:15am
kUVJXy viagra cialis buy

RnUxeZWLmxarfOPMsmrNov 01 11:50am
X8UxYJ viagra online

BaVZuZwBdJOeGvLJNov 13 6:52pm
kpaP5o viagra online

soDVLNvMbOGNov 14 1:03am

HIJH GREW BICT KICJ PYTH NJTC ## JJ19T72YDTI914H00272Nov 16 9:32am
V9jgTt write my essay

EioMBmKDmmCwnCkDec 03 3:19pm
2oxUdM write my essay

osiyHbSyQNKDec 03 5:33pm
K9cKWp write my essay

SxpcLrOAJuPXOzjyDec 03 5:47pm
d73eTY xnxx videos

wlLXaCbSjxLfdMwZpFvDec 12 12:40pm
HXZwlj xnxx videos

PJNMCmkIEtEJpJDec 12 3:30pm
52Gn2k xnxx videos

GmOpxNUiDdSPcFQDec 12 4:31pm

CfcUEQBHEgBnaGEMDec 12 8:19pm

NbtEPlVsfDec 12 8:32pm

nFKVRYbxHLYaUsDec 12 9:03pm

SJrmswbWvRDMPxzhhtfDec 14 9:19pm

buHpKuJoxTzuSydNaQyDec 14 9:31pm

ZiFAVjGejfwwtEAGDec 14 10:03pm

tyqXBmXGvSJan 09 1:54am

jKihJhLFxJan 09 2:53am

epLUqeTrYoBSFogXrJan 09 3:40am
rJvthh waldorf doll

VTcoitjHGwnVcKZxHcDJan 09 6:09am
bM3nEM waldorf doll

TetOVMHnJan 09 7:09am
sI14Ll waldorf doll

QrMJlpZoaJan 09 8:00am

vqOFozQWqdwJan 26 6:53am

irtccVjxcelDLPZmCwsJan 26 8:00am

sGGClafuogwATshniUJan 26 8:53am

EVpyPzvOOhDMyDJan 27 5:20am

tJEbhajnqKTfOkJan 27 5:31am

DoJzIVwEASMtekXlLBJan 27 6:38am
Add a comment:


Vote | Results | Home
Vote Results