![[Aaddzz Advertisement]](http://ad1.aaddzz.com/image/1/103644/www.likelike.com/)
Bummin! Entertainment Food Miscellaneous Morals and Ethics Personal Places Politics and Current Events Sex Society and Culture Sports and Games |
Comments
The future belongs in the Women Women are gaining power at an accelerating rate. Eventually, we will be governed by women, and there will be no choice but to accept it and support it to keep order. B.G. Women are taking over educationally, and will definitely be in charge within a couple of generations, if not sooner. Girls are leaving boys in the dust at school, and education is the key to power. Amy The girls of today are the women who will rule the world in years to come. Karra Absoloutely yes, we need to elect a woman president and start a transition towards a feminine management style in government. This is more appropriate for the modern world. The male dominated system is outdated and has proven it doesn't work anymore. Sylvia Yes, women are more intelligent, mature, and compassionate. Jeanne I agree. Once there is a woman president we will see more and more females in congress and in executive positions. There will be a gradual shift towards a female majority, and eventually there will be a government run exclusively by women. This is the direction society is going in. Carrie Why not support a government run entirely by women? In the past people have supported governments run entirely by men. It's only men worried about losing their unfair privileges who object. Heather Women will be in charge eventually. It is already starting to happen one step at a time. Giselle I think the government is on its way to being constituted exclusively of women sooner than we think. When it happens, there really won't be much of a choice in the matter. A lot of Democrats don't like Bush, but they still pay taxes and obey the law. We will still pay taxes when women are in control. Brett Women are more capable of having intelligent discussions. If all politicians were women, things would work much better. It is a truth that women are more successful than men. Sarah I hope that I am alive when women "take over the world". And then when we still have great problems to be solved, I can laugh in their faces. Of course, as women tend to do, they'll probably find a way to blame their messes on men. It's something that women always do, inable to accept accountability for anything. It all ties in with that "It's a woman's perogative to change her mind." How convenient for you. Randy So you want there to be problems so you can laugh in the faces of women? In other words, by your own admission, you have no aspiration to be active in solving problems, only to ridicule those charged with the responsibility of seeing things through. You are part of the problem, not the solution. So if women blame "their messes" on men like you, they are absolutely correct. At least you are big enough to admit it. Your comments are just one example of why it is time for women to take charge, before men destroy the world. Bill Women are emerging as the stronger sex in today's society, and will naturally assume more political power as this concept becomes further established. Sal Mr. Bill. I never once said that I would laugh in the faces of people who are truly committed to their statements. What I've said, and I have had this kind of conversation face-to-face with those like minded people (both women and men) who have come right out and said that the world would be a better place if women were in charge, but when pressed with questions as to how such a utopia would come about, they had no specific idea on how this would come about. This is the kind of thing that makes me "want to laugh in the faces" of these women and men who make claims without support for their idea. Would the world be a better place if women took charge? Who knows? It is not a given fact that it would or would not be. I just do not give much respect to replies like "It would be a better place, just because" which is the standard answer that a five-year-old would give. As far as me admit- ting that I do not want to help solve problems, you do not have the right to tell me what I meant to say. I did not imply directly or otherwise that I do not want to help solve the world's problems. I just meant to say, that I want the world's problems to be solved by people with actual ideas that would make the world far better than it is now. Women and men have to work together to solve the problems, one group alone will not be able to do it. And ideas are the foundation of a better world, not one line statements by some people in these polls that say "Yea, women rule! or men have messed things up since the dawn of time!" Ideas! Ideas! Ideas! And in many cases, women can be just as full of it, as men are. No one has a lock on empty comments. Randy Crime statistics reveal most problems in this world are caused by males. Women are more productive citizens, and are better equipped for handling authority. Cry about it all you want, you can't change what is happening in society. Women are already running things. Chere The results of this poll are interesting, a landslide in favor of a government ruled by women. The fact that so many people support this idea makes me think it could actually happen. Starr It's intersting that when men "rule" the world, it is a bad thing, but when women are destined to "rule" the world, then everything would be so much better. I have news for the believers of female rule. Rulers make bad leaders, and female rulers will not be any better. Rulers are those individuals or groups who are more interested in gaining power for personal reasons than they are for the common good. It seems that we have a lot of women on this board who are more interested in being rulers. Kind of sounds like the syst- em that we already have in place. As far as Chere's comments are concerned, of course men have caused most of the world's problems. Men have had most of the power since the beginning of the world. The reason why women have had to be more product- ive citizens is not because of an inate ability, but because of a lack of power and as time goes on, women will continue to accomplish great things, but they will also abuse their power as men have done. Martha Stewart's recent conviction as well Leona Helmsley are just two examples of that. Of course, those people who do not want to face the truth will simply pass this off as "men picking on strong women" in order to have to avoid facing the truth. Randy Give it up randy, women are superior and will rule every aspect of your life very soon. Melissa Give it up melissa, women are not superior, and if I wasn't intimidated by all the other posts spouting off about female superiority and the downfall of mankind, then I am not intimidated by your feeble one-liner Randy There is another poll on this site about mandatory castration for males. This guy Randy would be a good candidate for such a program, perhaps then he could learn to behave himself. Bad boy! Rosanne Maybe if we cut all their balls off, they wouldn't rape their daughters anymore. Theresa Preach on, Randy! Amen! Testify! What a bunch of puffed up psychopaths. Its all the same dreck! "Women are superior", "We are going to castrate you!", "Seems like every month there is a new study indicating that women are smarter than men." Studies by whom? Berkeley? The organization of man hating, radical feminazis? The national league of puffed up princesses? The coalition for rationalizing being a psychotic bitch. The fact is, those who seek power the most are those who should least have it. Aaron Theresa, would you actually castrate a little boy because you believe that you have the right to claim superiority for your sex? Men rape women not because of testosterone, they do it because they want to control women, to dominate them. You don't know any female control freaks? I sure do. But lets talk about women who kill their children. What excuses are you going to put up for these women? Randy I think a government constituted of women could be in the formative stage even now. The Democrats could run Hillary Clinton in 2008, and if they do, it is possible the Republicans will nominate a female as well (Condaleeza Rice?). If this happens, we could see a new pecking order in the future. LJ If you are trying to prove that women are superior politicians than men, then you better use better examples than Hillary Clinton or Condaleeza Rice. Or are these two women the only ones you know anything about? Randy Afraid not Melissa, you see most all the power you brag about was given to you by men. You fought, we listened. It is not a good idea to become arrogant at the fact that men have allowed you to become more than just a housewife. In an all-out war against man, women will lose, no doubt. Men and women together have formed a current media fad of "bad ass" females, but the world is not really like this and if women push against men in society beyond their bounds, it will be an absolute mess. In no way will men simply yeild all the power we have created. You women are simply not prepared for that. Bill M. Men did not give women power, they have oppressed women and tried to keep us down throughout history. The achievements of women have been accomplished by competing against men and beating them against the odds in what was once their world. To the victors go the spoils, and it is a woman's world now. Melissa No it is not a woman's world now. Men are still the majority of political figures. You are simply confusing facts with what the media tells you. Bill M. Within a generation that situation will be reversed. If you do not believe it, compare the status of women today to that of 20 years ago. The trend will only gain momentum . Anonymous That is not factual, it is simply speculation on your part, a.k.a an opinion. Bill M. Why not support reversing the gender ratio in the government? If the governement was mostly women and only a small percentage of men, things would probably be a lot better for everyone. Equality of the sexes is a myth. Part of the evolution of the human species will be the elevation of women to superior status over males. It's not some kinky fantasy, it's just logical. Women have been proved to be superior to men academically, better in business, better at life. The dominance of men has given us a world full of technological marvels and ecological catastrophe. Economic dispariy and incredible violence and destruction. Nations at war for centuries while male 'leaders' argue about who should have nukes and who shouldn't. People starve while armies are rallied to carry out insane adventures and cause needless destruction. We won't know what the world could be like if women were in charge in big numbers, but it would have to be better than the world under patriarchy. mereboy I would support a government consisting of women in the majority, at least. Women comprise more than half the population, and should represent not only themselves, but children. I don't see why a minority, adult males, should have a monopoly on power. In the same way, I'm glad to see that the majority of law and medical students are women. We deserve to be represented in legal, medical and ethical affairs, and to have our interests supported through majorities in the professions and in politics. Kaitlyn What starts out as a majority will eventually snowball into a monopoly in favor of women. It is already in place. Pricilla I would support funding for research into dyslexia. HH Oh, and as long as the majority--women--keep voting men into power, they have no right to complain that men still rule. Where's the female president? Why do you keep voting men into office, ladies? HH Randy is correct. Power can corrupt, no matter what the gender. The historical Amazons of northern Anatolia (that's now called Turkey, for the historically challenged) were not just a bunch of women as is portrayed by folklore. The Amazons were a culture ruled by the females. In order to control the men, all male infants had their Achilles tendons cut, crippling them for life. This prevented the males from military life, of course, so the women had to protect the land. The men performed all the menial slave labor. This was cruel, and it was done by women to men. That's not a halo over a woman's head--it's a cartoon bubble that says "I'm gonna getcha, boy." Kevin Canadian Bacon History takes time to evolve. Women will be voted into office soon enough. And when future generations look back, they will realize how quickly it happened in a historical perspective. Kathy When I was a kid my dad used to tell me that someday women would rule the world. When I see the way things have changed since then it appears he wasn't kidding. I have no doubt that eventually we will see a government run by females. It's hard to say if I would support it. That depends on how much choice I have in the matter. Tracy Amazons of northern Anatolia? Too many comic books or too many video games? Where do you people get this stuff? Randy I think Kathy's point is important - it was only thirty or forty years ago that things really began to change for women. A couple of generations. A couple more, what will western society look like? Anonymous water. Anonymous The way the question is worded seems like an attempt to get people to say yes. Anonymous Feminists and female superiorists/supremacists always conflate the distinction between man and boy into one category namely, males. They do this simple so that they can attack boys. Men did not conflate the girl/woman distinction into females, and back when men were in control ALL children regardless of their sex were in the same category namely that of children, a group which had a right to protection. Feminists have removed boys from the protected status, and thus we now see t-shirts like 'boys are stupid - throw rocks at them' and many others. In other words, when women realized they could not win the ‘battle of the sexes’ against men they turned towards boys and abused them verbally and manipulated them. That is exactly why we see so many boys here seconding the women who support the idea of female superiority. They have been brainwashed and manipulated as kids, abused at the hands of adult women who should know better. Some, though, stand strong, and in spite of all the manipulation and brainwashing they still can see the truth, which off course is that it is impossible to be ‘generally superior’ this is simply an oxymoron. If you do not understand why this is so, forget it, I shall not waste my time. Women are not morally superior to men, quite on the contrary. This is becoming more evident day after day, and most off the comments here just testify to this trend. Yep! I would support an all female government before I supported an all male government but I'd rather not have to make that choice. Anonymous Soon Anonymous When the time comes, you won't be asked if you want to accept it. If women seize power through the electoral process, the authority to hold that power will be rightfully theirs, that is how it works. Frank Yeah but 100% women? If it ever does happen I don't expect to live long enough to see it. I regard this as a hypothetical question. There may be a majority of women sooner than people expect but not exclusively women. Anonymous There have been ballots in the past on which all the candidates were men. Just the opposite could happen in the future. Anything is possible. If 2008 ends up with Hillary Clinton Vs. Condoleeza Rice, that will only be the beginning. Anonymous Women are so far ahead of men scholastically and their management acumen is unattainable by men. It is inevitable that they will take over in the political realm as well if they choose to. Whenever a man says that women aren't more intelligent he ends up sounding defensive and bitter - scared even. Not to mention misinformed. Yet when a woman says that women are more intelligent she sounds confident and progressive. An all female run government might be a bit of a stretch but 15 years ago the idea of females outperforming males in school by 15% on average didn't seem likely either. Now educators believe that the gap will widen even further. Not only would I support an all female government, I think we should have all female governments. Although I don't think it's likely in my lifetime and I'm ok with that. a guy "You would yes support government constituted only from women?" doesn't make any sense. The poll should say "Would you support a government constituted only from women?" I thought women were supposed to be intellectually superior (and blah, blah, blah, blah...)!? Anyways, you girls should to try to master the rules of grammar before you go master the universe. OK?? Aaron I think it will start with a woman being elected president, then the trend will pick up for women to be promoted and for the agenda of women to be advanced. Glenn Abortion is about to go down the drain and hopefully it will take all these irresponsible baby killers with them. Randy I don't understand this question. Maybe it has to do with the fact that I have a College Education that prevents me from understanding weird phrased questions. I will always support women. They are the future, and they have always been in HIStory, but not well documented. A Woman we have only one boy in our highschool student government...we needed a token guy, i guess. the girl who lost to him felt soooooo embarassed losing to a guy! anyways, i think society will be the same way soon-- a token guy in politics here and there but dominated by intelligent, motivated, educated, articulate women!!! laura The Future is FEMALE!!! In time we will see a government and society controlled by Women as no male can hope to keep up with a Woman. It may not happen in total for many years, but to not see that Women are slowly taking control is being blind to the reality of the situation. I fully support an all Female government and have been voting Female for many years. Female Supremacy is the natural order of life! JR well with how the world is going,they may not rule long,before some damn maniac starts ww3,i mean with the way the arabs and western countrys are acting these days,we may be entering the last century of the planet,i feel women may have started to move foward to late.I mean can you for one moment really see,the arab world or say china accepting or dealing with a western female goverment,in reality they will probaly look on them as weak and ripe to try and conquer,and oh if you think im talking poo,just check out all the arab websites,and see the contempt they have for the west. frank Benizir Bhutto was twice elected president of Pakistan. Indira Ghandi was prime minister of India. Indonesia has the highest muslim population in the world and they have or at least had a female president. When I was in China I noticed that the majority of their communal arbitrators are old women and one great thing Mao gave Chinese women was legal equality. Sure, they're still oppressed but at least they are legally equal. One thing that impressed me was how assertive Chinese women were and I can't imagine them behaving that way during imperialist times. Frank, I think you're confusing zealot websites with the true majority. I'm not suggesting that most men wack off at the thought of women being superior, that's obviously over the top fantasy. What most people everywhere want is a healthy society that's supportive of all it's citizens. Anonymous And i have nothing wrong with a fair and equal society,for all creeds and sexs.But for some reason i would fear just as much with mad females getting power,as much as men having it. FRANK Yes but I was disagreeing with your statement about China and Arab countries accepting female leadership. It's actually quite the contrary. Even Liberia has now elected a female president and they're the war torn impoverished African country founded by the US in the 1830's for liberated slaves. Thus the name; Liberia. I'll bet it's inconceivable for most Americans to accept a female president. Yours is the country that is almost the least represented by women in government among the industrialized nations. Even several mid east countries have quotas for female representation that is higher than the current US government. So I wouldn't worry too much about the rest of the world regarding you weak because of too many women in politics. Anonymous Visit yahoo groups :Are woman winning the battle of the sexes? Today woman are outperforming man academically, socially, technologically , biologically and sometimes even physically. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/womanwinning/ ARE TEENAGE GIRLS BECOMING STRONGER THAN BOYS ?Girls are stronger and more athletic now than ever, will they eventually pass up boys in sports? http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/viktfar/ Anonymous Check out womanwin yahoo group.The greatest group I ever seen .Great job about compiling information, articles , creative images ,fresh news and others about female superiority . Society is surrounded by images and signs of female e superiority- Woman are outperforming man academically, socially, technologically , biologically and even physically .We are witnessing the end of the battle of the sexes and woman are winning on every battle front Go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/womanwin/ I have to say that this group has probaly the best pictures about female supremecy ive ever seen.Obviously the words make the real difference to get the right mood. Anonymous I would support a women only goverment and I'm a republican! I understand that women are nicer, and will most likey do the right thing. You can see this by the amount of men in prison compared to women. Michael. You know, I have never, ever seen eye-to-eye with the likes of Rush Limbaugh, but man, the term "feminazi" is finally starting to make sense to me! I've never liked that term. But it makes such perfect sense now. Tell me, ladies: how is "female supremacy" any different than male supremacy? Or white supremacy? Supremacy, period, is a very, very dangerous ideology. Throughout history, every time people have taken this ball and run with it, the results have been disastrous. Do you realize how ironic it is that you're telling us how enlightened you are, and framing it in the language of supremacy? You make me laugh. I want a government of the smartest and wisest people, whoever they may be, whatever they've got between their legs. Cragslad It is what is between the ears which counts, but one would not expect a man to understand that concept. And if school records are any indication of intelligence, a very strong case can be made for the intellectual superiority of the female. It makes perfect sense to be governed by those most capable of making intelligent decisions. Dawn Michael is correct. Women conduct themselves in a much more civilized and enlightened manner. Women lead by example, and female role models are the best influence for young people. There would not be so much corruption with women in charge. Mae Great point Kaitlyn,Women and childen far outnumber males and thus Women who look after the greater amoung of children should be the only voters. Males opinions would not be banned but they would be considered.However it would be monstrous to allow males to determine the future of Womynkind.The poll results here show always that there is a majority for a Female Supremacist future.I for one now have a better life since my wife took over the finances and ultimate decision making in the family.She still loves me and does what she thinks is right for me her and our children and our society.Applied nationally this would certainly lead to a saner kinder world. Would Mothers,Siters,Aunts,Wives,Girlfreinds, Daughters,Female freinds,Grandmothers want to hurt their sons,brothers,nephews,hubbies,boytoys,brothers,male freinds,grandsons.I don't think so.They just want them to be less angry,resentful,obstinate,destructive,criminal,antisocial etc. As long as i never raise my voice or sulk my wife listens to me.I accept her decision after discussion but we rarely have had an arguement.When my voice does get to loud she asks me to take a deep breath and to lower my voice. I apologise and kiss her chhek or hand.On the odd occasion i have continued to be obsteporous and she has quite rightly slapped my face.At this point i know i have really overstepped the mark and i kneel down or prostrate myself and kiss her foot shoe or bottom. After my monthly discipline review i am allowed to speak my peice for a quater of an hour while she listens without talking.She then pronounces on any grievences i have and attempts to alter her behaviour or to make me see the error of my arguements.I am not punished further and the air is cleared.we call this "parliament" and as i kneel between her legs looking up into the face of the benevolent caring Woman i love often through the tears of my discplining i know things are going to be O.K. Lou Rolls www.likelike.com/poll.php?poll_id=2550 Anonymous Man and woman have been created, that is to say, willed by God: on the one hand, in perfect equality as human persons; on the other, in their respective beings as man and woman. “Being man” or “being woman” is a reality which is good and willed by God: man and woman possess an inalienable dignity which comes to them immediately from God their creator. Man and woman are both with one and the same dignity “in the image of God.” Man and woman were made “for each other” – not that God left them half-made and incomplete: he created them to be a communion of persons, in which each can be a “helpmate” to the other, for they are equal as persons … and complementary as masculine and feminine. Catechism of the Catholic Church, paras. 369 and 372. Anonymous Perhaps these good ladies on here would give examples of female leaders who have been peace lovers.Go on name them. mike s Benizir Bhutto, Indira Ghandi. I might add Jane Goodall who isn't a politician but she has evolved from a research scientist into a respected znd benevolent political force. The same could be said for Dianne Fossey who was brutaaly murdered by the same poachers she was trying to peaceably curtail. Anonymous What is the earliest age at which athletically active girls can have beautiful muscular legs that men like: (1) Age 18 (2) Age 21 (3) Age 25 (4) Age 30. MiniPoll A government of the smartest and wisest people? That is impossible, because the majority of voters have no idea what the issues are. They vote for the politician who is the best at hiding their true agenda and deceiving the people. The fact is, the best and brightest people in society do not aspire to go into politics, they are in the private sector. Ron Considering most males in government have been feminized by political correctness, this is already the situation. Anonymous Indira Ghandi and Benizar Bhutto both succeeded fathers. (For those out there who are ignorant of history Indira's father was Jawaharlu Nehru, not Mahatma Ghandi, she married a man named Ghandi who also was not related to Mahatma Ghandi) The same thing is true for Sukarno in Indonesia and Bhandarake in Sri Lanka. Since the mid-sixties Asians have shown a willingness to elect daughters of famous men. I am a Goddess Worshiper, a Matriarchist, and a husband whose marriage vows required ME to promise to love, honor and obey but lets not confuse Women who built on careers of fathers or husbands(Cory Acquino, Hillary Clinton) with Female Supremacists. obedient husband You are an insecure, weak man. You lack the intellect to recognize your wife is using your sexual fantasies to make a fool of you. She has no respect for you as a man, and carries on sexual relationships with other men. She will become tired of you and dump you eventually. Women are not turned on by submissive men, they are disgusted by them. Grow up and get a grip on reality. Gretta Ms. Gretta, since You are member of the Superior Sex I owe You respect. However, with all due respect, Wife has owned me for the last fifteen years and does not seem to tire of me. You take a traditional Patriarchal view toward sex. A true Matriarchist accepts the fact that the Wife/Female owner in a relationship has the right to have many slaves and also has the right to loan Her husband/ or slaves out to other Women either for profit or for Her own amusement. Nevertheless, the strong manner in which You express Yourself implies that if You could overcome Your prejudices You would be quite capable of owning and using Your own male slaves. Respectfully obedient husband I stand corrected. Gretta Why thank you Ma'am. I hope you find an obedient male to serve you. obedient husband HILLARY CLINTON IS THE BIGGEST LIAR IN THIS COUNTRY. SHE BADS MOUTH BUSH..WHEN SHE KNOWS HE HAS MADE ALL THE RIGHT DECISIONS. LELGT Yes but Kay Bailey Hutchinson would make a better President than Howard Dean. There was a time when most Female politicians were liberal socialist Democrats but that is no longer true. Assessing the merits of an all Female government based on one person is as illogical on assessing the merits of an all male government based on Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot. obedient husband #0082 - (Thu.) 7/26/07 Update The only correct decision Bush made was to go into Afghanistan, which anybody would have done. He made the wrong decision to invade weakling, formerly irrelevant Iraq. He made the wrong decision by declaring to the world the US was willing and capabe of fighting on as many fronts as necessary to combat terrorism. Evidently, we're not even capable of fighting on one front because we have absolved ourselves of primary responsibility in Afghanistan in order to direct our military resources into Iraq (which ain't going too well by the way). It was wrong, if not insane to declare to the world that the United States was prepared to launch a nuclear strike at suspected terrorist locations, N. Korea or Iran. He made the wrong decision to threaten N. Korea but I supppose some credit should be given on his reversal of the Kim Jong Il thing but capitulation isn't a strong stance. He was wrong to threaten Iran instead of opening up official channels with them 5 years ago and soliciting the cooperation of Russia, since Iran is more in their back pocket than ours. He shouldn't have pretended to be supporting democracy while supporting Saudi Arabia, possibly the least democratic country in the world. He shouldn't have supported Pakistan unconditionally knowing that Mushareef is a military dictator who usurped a democratically elected Benizir Bhutto. A bloodless coup to be sure and Bhutto was under scrutiny for corruption but a military coup none the less. He shouldn't have censored every single environmental recommendation until it became impossible to muzzle the global scientific community. The list is almost endless...having said that however, Hillary certainly does lie. She supported Bush on Iraq and it is obvious she understood his real agenda and wasn't hoodwinked at all by the White houses concealment of intelligence regarding Iraqi WMD's. She knew all along they didn't have any, just like Bush knew all along they didn't have any. We're the ones who sold them their WMD's in the first place, how could we not have had a pretty damn good idea of how many of them remained? It was impossible for Hussein to have hid any significant amount since the confiscation and destruction of them was carefully accounted for. Bush is all lies. Every utterance he has made as president is a lie. Hillary probably wouldn't be much more honest though. Anonymous It is a wonderful topic to see being discussed. Who would have thought even 10 or 20 years ago that anyone would dream of a Women run government. That just shows how far Women have come. Would i support a government made up of 100% Women. ABSOLUTELY. Every election, i vote for every Woman i can. As a general rule, Women are smarter than men, more willing to work hard, more caring, and more focused. Also, it seems like Women are getting to be in better shape. underher Bush has never done anything wrong. People are being duped by the propaganda of a liberal media out of control. And it is amazing to see how passionately these left wing nut cases believe what they see on the news. By the time they figure out who they have been supporting, the damage will already be done. Anonymous Explain the rationale behind your statement that bush has never done anything wrong. I was certainly willing to offer up some examples of why I don't respect that ignorant fool a couple of posts ago but like always, you George Shrub supportrs never actually explain why you agree with his policies. It's like none of you have minds of your own, you just drool out the same inane diatribe time and time again. "Liberal media campaign" As for believing the news, have you ever even been out of the US? Have you ever even bothered to travel to some of these countries and see with your own eyes what actually goes on on the world? I don't think any of you people do. Anonymous It should also be stated that defending your own ignorance by declaring everything propoganda is paranoid and pathetic. Where did you get this information anyway? How do you know the informant you depend on isn't the one spreading propoganda? You're entitled to support Bush despite his being childishly incompetent and appallingly corrupt, my point is that none of you ever argue anything of substance. Why do you think it was wise NOT to stay the course in Afghanistan. What was it about Iraq that struck you as being more important to invade than finishing the job in Afghanistan? What do you find so prescient and virtuous about an administration that has denied environmental change is linked to human activity until their 7th year in office. Now they admit humans can and should act on climate change. The Shrub administration has done absolutely nothing right. It's the worst administration in U.S. history. It's an embarrassment. Anonymous Well let's get back on track. Catherine Asaro wrote a book called The Last Hawk about a planet that was divided up into Feudal Estates. The rulers of the Estates met periodically in counsel. But what made it interesting is that all the rulers were Women. They each kept harems of male slaves and traded and sold these slaves among themselves. obedient husband That sounds like a very interesting book. Anonymous It was. Read it and let me know what you think. obedient husband The fact is, liberals have so much blind hatred for Bush that are not even capable of recognizing he alone has protected the U.S. from another attack, in spite of all the cowards on both sides of the political spectrum. The fact that they owe their lives to George W. Bush is more than they can bear to admit. Kind of like angry teenagers who hate their parents, although they are supported and protected by them. William Only if it is purely coincidental as a result of a democratic voting process of men and women voting for men and women. You cannot have it both ways, if men are diferent to women then diversity is needed in a good government. If they are the same then it doesnt matter if a man or woman is in power. Which is it to be ?. FNOL Women will be pushed beck to the oppression of the 7th century when radical islam overruns Western Society. This may seem like an improbable notion, but be advised that America no longer has the will to defend herself. When you are unwilling to defend against an enemy willing to die, survival is impossible. Shelly I just farted Anonymous #0095 - (Tue.) * 4/22/08 Update No, I wouldn't support a government only by women and that isn't about to happen. Since cabinet posts have to be approved by the house and senate, and since the government is still dominated by white males, it isn't going to happen any time so even if Hillary and Bill are able to steal the election. Chelsea Cabinet posts only have to be approved by the Senate. As a mere male I should not be contradicting a Female(I assume Chelsea is a Female) but the facts are the facts. Nevertheless Chelsea would still be entitled to beat me for contradicting Her. obedient husband I would no support a government run only by women and would run all of the pansy boys out first, starting with obedient husband. (tool) Steven So, obedient husband. If we can assume that Chelsea is a female, can we be equally chauvenistic in assuming you are too? Steve Hillary Clinton is living proof that women are equal to men in being crooked, dishonest and condescending. She is such a phony, I cannot believe anyone is actually swalling her load. I suppose these were the same people with her in Bosnia. Bill Clinton Laura, if you are talking about the one boy in your class government being token, then you are not as smart or articulate as you boast. You are a chauvenistic pig however. Randy https://donate.barackobama.com Anonymous Now that lying HIllary is out, there are no more ramblings from the female supremacists? I few well thought out posts from reality seekers and you all fold up like obedient husband's winnie in a windstorm. So much for female domination. Defender of the male spirit Sarah Palin will be president within 8 years, and women shall rule the earth. Obedient Boyfriend f*ck women, Men always rules in government and in politics or in the right places where the work is doned. owner The future will be feminine. Eventually, women will rule in government, business, and the professions. They will rule society and culture. In the modern world, education is the path to power. In educational attainment, females are leaving males far behind. In time, the average woman will be better educated, have a more prestigious job, and make more money than the average man. Women will comprise the majority of students in medical and law schools. It is only natural that in time they will comprise the majority of doctors and lawyers. The same will happen in business. The "glass ceiling" will eventually be shattered. It will be the men who will look up in corporations and see the opposite sex in charge. Women will comprise the majority in legislatures at all levels of government. Thus, they will make the laws. They will determine public policy. When most lawyers are women, it will be only natural that in time women will dominate the judiciary. Women will make the laws and women will judge the application of the laws. Being better educated, women will dominate the civil service. Lastly (in terms of consideration but not necessarily time), in time the majority of governors and presidents will be women. The pool of persons from whom government executives -- mayors, governors, and presidents -- are drawn will mostly be women. Moreover, the majority of voters will be women. All this will happen because females outperform males educationally. It is just a matter of time. It will be fact. There is no alternative to accepting it. We are a law-abiding people and there is no reason to think that both women and men will not accept female rule in government, business, and the professions. At the interpersonal level, there may be more stress in female-male relationships and marriage. The average girlfriend/wife will have a more prestigious job and make more money than her boyfriend/husband. It would be only natural for her to become the head of the relationship. Both women and men may find this change in traditional gender relationships stressful. However, men will probably feel more stress because at present, men are supposed to "wear the pants" in a relationship. They are objects of derision if they do not. However, in time, in most relationships the woman will "wear the pants" and eventually this will become the norm. The big question is, "Will business, government, and society be better off because women will have become the dominant sex?" I think the answer to that depends on your answer to another question, "Is the average woman morally superior to the average man?" I think the answer is "Yes!" Prophet of a Feminine Future Dawn, girls are outperforming boys because the system has been rewired to favour the way girls learn, just as it was once wired to favour boys years ago. As to your statement that it's what's between the ears that counts, you are correct. What a shame it is for you to mess it all up by stating that one would not expect a man to understand that concept. Shame on you, you poor mysandronistic female chauvanist sow-bitch. P.S. I hope that the shock induced by your surprise at my knowlege of large, multi syllabic wordage did nit induce cardiac arrest. an intelligent life form Sorry, that was supposed to be "did 'not' induce cardiac arrest." Even we I.L.Fs make the occasional typo. an intelligent life form Prophet, much as I hesitate to admit, you may be on to something. As you omitted the 'ess' suffix from your name, thus repudiating the male chauvanist bovine faeces, you make a good case at least for equality. an intelligent life form Prophet, much as I hesitate to admit, you may be on to something. As you omitted the 'ess' suffix from your name, thus repudiating the male chauvanist bovine faeces, you make a good case at least for equality. an intelligent life form This is all nonsense women have never constituted any government. The only times when they have been in charge and of any consequence, such as Queen Elizabeth 1 and Margaret Thatcher in England they were surrounded by men and would have it no other way. Margaret Thatcher did have a very few women in her government when she started but soon got rid of them. The only time a number women get into government is when you have weak incompetent leaders like Obama and Blair. In answer to obedient boyfriend Sarah Palin is the reason Obama is now in the White House. Anonymous In the 90's Norway had a Female Prime Minister and the majority of the cabinet consisted of Women. obedient husband Women have lesser brains then men. But they are beatifull so I will vote for a government with all blonde naked women. Anonymous In the recent primary polls in the US, women have won hands down. It will not be long before women will take over in all areas and prove their superiorty and it will be about time to get the males out of power so women can once again clean up the mess the males have made. It is clear that the males do think with their pricks and they think just because they have balls, they can do anything they want. Well it is time for women to remove a lot of balls. Ron Males may have the balls, but women have the brains so YES lets let women rule Mike Women would have less wars but since war is a male activity, I contend that we should protect women better than it appers we have been. If men want to have wars 100% of those killed should be male. This includes civilian populations as no woman or child should die in wars, it should always be 100% male. During the Civil War, 660 mals died and only 60 women so it appears they did protect women better but if anyone had to die it should be males 660,000 women ZERO Amy Add a comment: Vote Results |
Bummin!