Search:




Your Ad Here

Should sexual relationships be mandatory?

Question: I write this with humor. So please I am not serious. But the direction this country is going in, nothing would suprise me either.

They say people who are in relationships are less likely to get involved in crime; and less prone to heart disease and cancer.That means those in relationships are less of a burdeon. So since Obama is talking about making it MANDATORY for us to take out health insurance. Should it also be mandatory for all of us to be in sexual relationships? So that we can \
Created by: DOeswonder at 03:21:50 AM, Tuesday, September 29, 2009 EDT

Comments

All males should be chemically castrated, later physical castration. Then there would be no sexual relationships. What good is a penis anyway!!!!

LindaOct 02 2009 3:54pm


HUH? What good is a penis anyway? Duh!!! ARE YOU KIDDING??? That sounds just like something that would be said by a girl who is short and fat with a tight vagina who has a morbid fear of penetration. Such a girl needs to have A TALL SKINNY GUY!!! It has been said that tall skinny guys have huge, long, rock-hard penises while short fat girls have tight vaginas. Therefore, I believe that a sexual relationship (ESPECIALLY SEXUAL INTERCOURSE!!!) between a short fat girl and a tall skinny guy should be MANDATORY!!! That would be the best way for him to "break her in." And if she is a virgin, that would be the best way for him to deflower her once and for all. Upon the quick (and hopefully painless) penetration deep into her tight pussy, his huge, long, rock-hard penis would plow straight through her hymen and then push those tightly closed walls of her vagina WIDE OPEN!!! However, the tall skinny guy would have to protect himself against potential harm because the short fat girl is considerably larger and stronger than he is despite his huge penis size and his greater height over her. If he somehow manages to prevent her from overpowering him (like the larger female spider overpowers the smaller male spider upon mating), then he will be able to get the job done once and for all to start her on her way to a lifetime of sexual satisfaction, whether with him or with other guys. Of course, all of the feminists and the so-called "female supremacists" out there would be totally disappointed to lose yet another one of their gender to THE GREAT JOY OF SEX!!! They are JEALOUS!!! They all need to realize that A PENIS IS MEANT TO ENTER A VAGINA and A VAGINA IS MEANT TO BE ENTERED BY A PENIS!!!

AnonymousOct 06 2009 4:49pm
Women are not worth the trouble. Celibacy and singlehood are better for men than getting married or having girlfriend.

AnonymousOct 06 2009 10:53pm
Never kissed, or had sex with a woman; NO relationship EVER and I am 65 yrs old BY CHOICE; women are just a bunch of walking vaginas after your wallet! AND I AM THE HAPPIEST MAN ALIVE!

WilliamOct 10 2009 7:40am
Wowwee. A FUTURE SAINT!!! I wonder which future Pope will canonize you!!!

AnonymousOct 11 2009 4:46pm
Pope Benedict XVI, perhaps?

an intelligent life formJan 08 2010 4:54pm
Males who cannot attract a woman would be assigned to a woman by the government. Mandatory sexual service to the female would be enforced by an electrically charged chastity device. The woman would be given the remote to persuade the male to comply with her wishes for the rest of his life.

NosfemdomusSep 16 2013 9:29am
Xut4Ri I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Much thanks again. Cool.

gREooGXGJkVduyQgHOct 24 2013 9:02am
vjTIp6 Appreciate you sharing, great blog article. Really Cool.

MSljJDueOct 25 2013 10:42pm
6gCrSz wow, awesome blog article.Thanks Again. Great.

tZkNoJVVJaApr 19 2014 5:49am
5vbLh2 I value the blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

KHqvaRYESaudgenMay 11 2014 5:13am
3s1bbd Wow, great blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

RwMNChHpFvJQlmcvbIOct 25 2019 11:54pm
Add a comment:
Comment:


By:


Vote | Results | Home
Vote Results